2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational Definition of Active and Healthy Aging (AHA): The European Innovation Partnership (EIP) on AHA Reference Site Questionnaire: Montpellier October 20–21, 2014, Lisbon July 2, 2015

Abstract: A core operational definition of active and healthy aging (AHA) is needed to conduct comparisons. A conceptual AHA framework proposed by the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing Reference Site Network includes several items such as functioning (individual capability and underlying body systems), well-being, activities and participation, and diseases (including noncommunicable diseases, frailty, mental and oral health disorders). The instruments proposed to assess the conceptual framewor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was a retrospective study in the healthy Chinese population who underwent routine health examination carried out between April 1st, 2009 and May 1st, 2017 at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. As described previously [ 17 19 ], the population enrolled into this study included the healthy subjects aged 18–89 years old without evidence of acute infection, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, cancer, diabetes, gout, obstructive pulmonary disease and Alzheimer’s disease based on the previous medical record in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. Those with various diseases and abnormal medical laboratory tests such as eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73m 2 were excluded from this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was a retrospective study in the healthy Chinese population who underwent routine health examination carried out between April 1st, 2009 and May 1st, 2017 at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. As described previously [ 17 19 ], the population enrolled into this study included the healthy subjects aged 18–89 years old without evidence of acute infection, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, cancer, diabetes, gout, obstructive pulmonary disease and Alzheimer’s disease based on the previous medical record in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. Those with various diseases and abnormal medical laboratory tests such as eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73m 2 were excluded from this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This diversity of views regarding contexts for promoting healthy aging merits an examination at the intersection of various aspects of older adults' lives such as race, socioeconomic status, living situation, physical and emotional health, spirituality, and other dimensions. A range of approaches for defining healthy aging from the perspectives of older adults and persons studying aging have been evaluated in the literature [3][4][5][6]. These perspectives are rooted in distinct traditions of theory and empirical work that inform current practices to support aging [7]; however, little is known about the perspectives of community-based practitioners' who work directly with older adults and deliver programs to promote their healthy aging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Living well and maintaining healthy mentation, cognitive functions and physical health compatible with independent social activity in the elderly have become important, high‐priority goals for many modern societies. Different terms that describe the optimal life status of elderly include healthy ageing, successful ageing and productive ageing, and are commonly seen in published studies where similar meanings are characterised by sustained health, vitality, psychological and social well‐being in elderly, although diagnostic criteria of these terms vary . Recently, a meta‐analysis by Kim et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%