2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational experiences of municipal heating plants with biomass-fired ORC cogeneration units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1-Decreasing the energy intensity of buildings and industry by recovering waste heat [23] through the use of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems. 2-Developing a way to convert renewable energy sources (solar [24], geothermal [25], and biomass [26]) to electricity more efficiently [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-Decreasing the energy intensity of buildings and industry by recovering waste heat [23] through the use of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems. 2-Developing a way to convert renewable energy sources (solar [24], geothermal [25], and biomass [26]) to electricity more efficiently [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of research on ORC has been carried out . Dai et al have studied the performance of ORC with 10 different working fluids in which R236ea shows the highest exergy efficiency of 35.43%; Hettiarachchi et al evaluated the performance of different type of working fluids in details in an optimized ORC; Li et al compared ordinary ORC and two‐stage ORC in detail, and the results indicate that two‐stage ORC can decrease the irreversible loss; Wang et al used mixtures as the working fluid of subcritical ORC in order to get better system performance; Kalina et al presented two different systems based on ORC, operational parameters, size and investment which were especially considered; Zhang et al studied a kW‐scale ORC to study the effects of the mass flow of working fluid and heat source; Schuster et al studied the energy and exergy efficiencies of subcritical and supercritical ORC using different working fluids; Cayer et al compared the performance of CO 2 , ethane and R125 as the working fluid for a transcritical ORC; Zhang et al studied a R134a ORC, and the result shows that the discussed ORC has good sustainability; Uusitalo et al studied the performance of hydrocarbons, fluorocarbons and siloxanes as the working fluid for subcritical ORC and analyzed the effects of their critical properties; Yi et al proposed a multi‐objective mathematical programming model for ORC which takes environmental impact and thermo‐economic performance into account; Wang and Fu improved the efficiency of a solar assisted cogeneration system by coupling with an ORC, and an increment of 9.87% in efficiency was obtained . Wang et al and Lu et al conduct experimental research on the actual performances of an ORC using R601a/R600a and R1233zd as the working fluid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a technology capable of converting renewable and waste heat to electricity, the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power plant has been widely investigated in the last decade. The growing interest in developing ORC systems is partly because it lends itself well to applications including geothermal energy [1], solar thermal energy [2], biomass energy [3], and low-grade waste heat recovery [4]. Furthermore, the system can be successfully adapted to a low [5] and medium [6] temperature energy sources due to great variety of possible working fluids, including refrigerants [7], hydrocarbons [8] or siloxanes [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%