2012
DOI: 10.3103/s1068798x12030239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational failure of tractor gears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original gear micro hardness is confirming the recommended values ISO 6336-5 [4] and reference [5], as shown in table (1) and figure (6).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The original gear micro hardness is confirming the recommended values ISO 6336-5 [4] and reference [5], as shown in table (1) and figure (6).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…ISSN: 2319-1058 Gear (1) had some broken teeth and cracks at the keyway, as shown in figure (4) but not complete separation as the original gear, figure (2). Also, gear (2) had some broken teeth and cracks at the keyway, as shown in figure (5). Both manufactured gears had a severe pitting through the most of gears' teeth, as shown in figures (3, 4 and 5).…”
Section: Observations and Reviewmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The material analysis confirmed suitable material as required, microhardness survey of the pinion had revealed that a carburizing case depth at the teeth was not confirming the recommended values of references [17,18] because the depth equal 2.3 mm and it is much greater than the recommended suitable to the case data which causing the carburizing case is full hardened portion at the tip of the teeth. So, this portion miss its toughness and could not resist impact load.…”
Section: The Material Microhardness and Microstructurementioning
confidence: 98%