2005
DOI: 10.2166/aqua.2005.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational performance of biological treatment plant for iron and manganese removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2001, a groundwater treatment plant was built in Shenyang, Liaoning province China, which adopted the novel biological process for iron and manganese removal. The satisfactory removal of iron and manganese and the low operation/maintenance costs have been reported (Li et al 2005). The excellent quality of filtrate (Fe < 0.05mgr', Mn<0.05mgl ') proved the validity of the biological process for iron and manganese removal from groundwater {Fe^^: 0.01-0.5mgl"'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 2001, a groundwater treatment plant was built in Shenyang, Liaoning province China, which adopted the novel biological process for iron and manganese removal. The satisfactory removal of iron and manganese and the low operation/maintenance costs have been reported (Li et al 2005). The excellent quality of filtrate (Fe < 0.05mgr', Mn<0.05mgl ') proved the validity of the biological process for iron and manganese removal from groundwater {Fe^^: 0.01-0.5mgl"'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is known that groundwater is the only water resource in many countries (Li & Liu 1989;Gao 2004;Zhang et al 2005). It is a common phenomenon for the groundwater to contain iron and manganese (Fe^^, Mn^^) (Zhou & Zhu 1997;Murdoch & Smith 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the matured Mn sand, which was selected from a biological Fe, Mn, and NH 3 -N removal plant that operated at an approximate 10˚C water temperature, was inoculated to the upper part of the filter bed when the operation began, and thus, the total height of the filter bed was 130 cm. Additionally, the biofilters in that plant have been operated for several years and the start-up period was about 2-3 months [17]. The raw water was pumped from the secondary cascaded-aeration tank of the water supply plant, and used as inflow and backwashing water.…”
Section: Groundwater and Pilot Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, simultaneous removal of these contaminants could be achieved by using a one-stage biofilter (Abu Hasan et al, 2012;Gouzinis et al, 1998;Štembal et al, 2004;Tekerlekopoulou and Vayenas, 2008), which simplifies the treatment processes and reduces costs. Li et al (2005) demonstrated that using biological processes in a water supply plant (total treatment capacity: 12 Â 10 4 m 3 day À1 ) could reduce investment costs by 50 million yuan (¥), and operational and maintenance costs by ¥12,000 per day. Meanwhile, Tekerlekopoulou et al (2013) describing and summarizing the work of Mouchet (1992) noted that a shift from abiotic to biotic methods could substantially increase treatment capacity and reduce operational costs by up to 80%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inoculation levels of microorganisms in a newly built full-scale biofilter seem to be insufficient to achieve simultaneous removal immediately. Although reports describing the profile of Mn concentrations during the start-up period of full-scale biofilters are rare, Li et al (2005) demonstrated that a start-up period of 2-3 months was necessary. The required values of standards for Fe, Mn, and ammonia in China are 0.3 mg/L, 0.1 mg/L, and 0.5 mg/L, respectively (SEPA, 2002).Therefore, ways to shorten the start-up period is of great importance for the further application of this biotechnology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%