Operational research as implementation science: definitions, challenges and research priorities

Abstract

BackgroundOperational research (OR) is the discipline of using models, either quantitative or qualitative, to aid decision-making in complex implementation problems. The methods of OR have been used in healthcare since the 1950s in diverse areas such as emergency medicine and the interface between acute and community care; hospital performance; scheduling and management of patient home visits; scheduling of patient appointments; and many other complex implementation problems of an operational or logistical nature.DiscussionTo date, there has been limited debate about the role that operational research should take within implementation science. I detail three such roles for OR all grounded in upfront system thinking: structuring implementation problems, prospective evaluation of improvement interventions, and strategic reconfiguration. Case studies from mental health, emergency medicine, and stroke care are used to illustrate each role. I then describe the challenges for applied OR within implementation science at the organisational, interventional, and disciplinary levels. Two key challenges include the difficulty faced in achieving a position of mutual understanding between implementation scientists and research users and a stark lack of evaluation of OR interventions. To address these challenges, I propose a research agenda to evaluate applied OR through the lens of implementation science, the liberation of OR from the specialist research and consultancy environment, and co-design of models with service users.SummaryOperational research is a mature discipline that has developed a significant volume of methodology to improve health services. OR offers implementation scientists the opportunity to do more upfront system thinking before committing resources or taking risks. OR has three roles within implementation science: structuring an implementation problem, prospective evaluation of implementation problems, and a tool for strategic reconfiguration of health services. Challenges facing OR as implementation science include limited evidence and evaluation of impact, limited service user involvement, a lack of managerial awareness, effective communication between research users and OR modellers, and availability of healthcare data. To progress the science, a focus is needed in three key areas: evaluation of OR interventions, embedding the knowledge of OR in health services, and educating OR modellers about the aims and benefits of service user involvement.

Evaluating Community-Based Integrated Health and Social Care Services: The Simtegr8 Approach

“…In response to this challenge a line of research in facilitated DES has emerged which aims to tackle the need for stakeholder engagement throughout the simulation project lifecycle to ensure that useful and relevant to the stakeholders models are developed (Robinson et al 2014;Tako and Kotiadis 2015;Baril et al 2016;Proudlove et al 2017). Furthermore, there is currently an increasing interest internationally in involving patients and members of the public in health care research, recognizing the potential benefits that members of the public and service users have to offer in designing and improving health services (Pearson et al 2013;Monks 2016). In the UK also, health and social care service providers are committed to involving service users and patients in the planning, development and evaluation of their services (Pearson et al 2013).…”

Ending Malaria Transmission in the Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network (APMEN) Countries: Challenges and the Way Forward

“…The goal is to strengthen health services and improve healthcare delivery in disease-endemic countries and it has an additional critical role to play in helping solve major implementation problems [121,[126][127][128]. The key elements of OR are that the research questions are generated by identifying the constraints and challenges encountered during the implementation of programme activities, thus can be imbedded into routine programmatic activities [129].…”

Anaesthetic research in low‐ and middle‐income countries

“…Some would argue that the challenge in LMICs is not what to do, but how to improve care to current high‐income country standards. Indeed, the fields of implementation science, improvement science, and operational research may all be used to embed this within academically rigorous frameworks .…”