2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operational research on rural, community-managed Water Safety Plans: Case study results from implementations in India, DRC, Fiji, and Vanuatu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the key challenge here is implementing the approach as intended. Reactive management and associated 'obstruction of water delivery' has been described even for cases where water safety planning is actively being attempted 33 (p. 5). As discussed in the following sections, implementing water safety planning as intended is likely to require external support and early inclusion.…”
Section: Contextualising Monitoring Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But the key challenge here is implementing the approach as intended. Reactive management and associated 'obstruction of water delivery' has been described even for cases where water safety planning is actively being attempted 33 (p. 5). As discussed in the following sections, implementing water safety planning as intended is likely to require external support and early inclusion.…”
Section: Contextualising Monitoring Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also reflected in the literature on water safety planning, which frequently highlights inadequate financing [34][35][36][37] and capacity 34,35,[38][39][40] as substantial barriers to successful implementation. In rural areas in particular, inadequate financing and capacity have meant that water safety planning efforts focus on the early stages of the approach (assembling a team, describing the water supply and identifying hazards, developing and implementing a plan for improvement) but neglect the latter stages of monitoring, verification, and iterative learning 33,39 , which are crucial to the effectiveness and sustainability of the approach 29,37 . Financial and capacity-building support is needed.…”
Section: Contextualising Monitoring Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actors ranged from research/university institutions (the WEDC and Makerere University at the initial formative stage) and international collaborators (the IWA and GIZ facilitating implementation) to government ministry and standards body (the MWE and UNBS for regulation) [7,9,25]. The international and national collaborators similarly facilitated WSP capacity building in Senegal and Burkina Faso [22], the Comoros [20], the Democratic Republic of Congo [15,16] and Kenya [17,18]. Similarly, a research project was carried out in four countries, including the DRC, to ascertain and share lessons learnt from WSP implementation with the support of UNICEF [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program applied a WSP framework to ensure the delivery of safe and sustainable water services in schools and villages. In view of the poor drinking water quality observed at the household level, the promotion of household water treatment and safe storage practices was recommended [15,16]. In Kenya, the government, through the Ministry of Health issued a policy brief on water safety surveillance and recommended the training of all water service providers on WSP implementation as a means of averting frequent waterborne disease outbreaks in the country [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation