Operational Strategy, R&D and Intra-metropolitan Clustering in a Polycentric Structure: The Advanced Electronics Industries of the Los Angeles Basin

Abstract

The multiple clustering of economic activities is one of the most distinctive characteristics of a polycentric metropolitan area. The relationship between intra-metropolitan location, research and development (R&D), operational strategy and production is analysed, to determine whether spatial clusters are more supportive of R&D than non-clustered locations. Two major operational strategies commonly utilised in advanced electronics production, outsourcing and the use of just-in-time (JIT) production methods, and their relationship with intra-metropolitan location and R&D intensity are considered, to determine their effects on spatially clustered and non-clustered establishments. The intra-metropolitan distribution of clusters in the Los Angeles basin, their potential industrial district effects, and the role of externalities are also evaluated, to determine the relationship between polycentricity and high-technology production. Extensive statistical analyses are then undertaken with establishment-level data for seven 4-digit advanced electronics sectors, in the telecommunications, electromedical and advanced computer equipment manufacturing groups in the Los Angeles basin. Comparative statistical analyses on a sample of Silicon Valley establishments are also performed, in order to place the Los Angeles basin's findings in perspective. The results of this research contradict some of the most common assumptions on the benefits of spatial industrial clustering, that have been diffused in the literature.

Multinational Enterprises and the Geographical Clustering of Innovation

“…Research has shown an increase in innovating patenting activity for firms within a cluster (Baptista and Swann, 1998;Beaudry, 2001). Others do not find any increase in innovation (Suarez-Villa and Walrod, 1997;Alsleben, 2005).…”

Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey

“…Moreover, these firms establish network relationships (i.e. alliances, join-ventures, collaborative research and so on) with customers and suppliers Even more than that, a few studies have shown that not locating in a cluster may actually hold some advantages, by allowing firms to safeguard their privacy and to introduce new products earlier than their competitors (Suarez-Villa and Walrod, 1997;Oakey and Cooper, 1989). In particular, Suarez-Villa and Walrod found that non-clustered electronic establishments spent on average 3.6 times more on R&D and employed 2.5 times more R&D personnel than clustered ones.…”

How the West Has Won: Regional and Industrial Inversion in U.S. Patent Activity

“…This format is perfect for CMSA, obviating the need for case studies (for good reviews, see Suarez-Villa and Walrod, 1997;Malecki, 1986) and adding the benefit of econometric precision to the wonderful work of Sokoloff (1988) and Suarez-Villa (1993). CMSA has been used exclusively in international trade circles, to investigate whether changes in trade patterns are associated with variations specific to the economic sector of production or geographic destination (Laursen, 2000;Boltho, 1996;Balassa, 1979;Leamer and Stern, 1970;Renten and Duffy, 1970).…”