Operationalising ethics in artificial intelligence for healthcare: a framework for AI developers

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) offers much promise for improving healthcare. However, it runs the looming risk of causing individual and societal harms; for instance, exacerbating inequalities amongst minority groups, or enabling compromises in the confidentiality of patients’ sensitive data. As such, there is an expanding, unmet need for ensuring AI for healthcare is developed in concordance with human values and ethics. Augmenting “principle-based” guidance that highlight adherence to ethical ideals (without necessarily offering translation into actionable practices), we offer a solution-based framework for operationalising ethics in AI for healthcare. Our framework is built from a scoping review of existing solutions of ethical AI guidelines, frameworks and technical solutions to address human values such as self-direction in healthcare. Our view spans the entire length of the AI lifecycle: data management, model development, deployment and monitoring. Our focus in this paper is to collate actionable solutions (whether technical or non-technical in nature), which can be steps that enable and empower developers in their daily practice to ensuring ethical practices in the broader picture. Our framework is intended to be adopted by AI developers, with recommendations that are accessible and driven by the existing literature. We endorse the recognised need for ‘ethical AI checklists’ co-designed with health AI practitioners, which could further operationalise the technical solutions we have collated. Since the risks to health and wellbeing are so large, we believe a proactive approach is necessary for ensuring human values and ethics are appropriately respected in AI for healthcare.

Artificial Intelligent Tools: Evidence-Mapping on the Perceived Positive Effects on Patient-Care

“…This will help reduce large patient numbers at the hospital and improve the overall turnaround time for care. Meanwhile, out review contradicts previous studies [15,24] which raised concerns over AI tools providing care in a discriminatory care manner, questions their utility in mental health services, and sceptical about their ability to provide nonpharmacological care. Regardless of this, a large body of previous studies [7,13,16,25] suggest that AI tools could signi cantly improve the total quality of care provided.…”

Economics of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Diagnosis vs. Treatment

“…Solanki et al [ 185 ] presented go-beyond approaches that provide guidelines based on principles such as adherence to “fairness” and adopting a framework based on solutions that AI programmers can use to operationalize ethics in AI for healthcare across all phases of the AI lifecycle, including data management, model development, deployment, and monitoring. The authors strongly emphasize actionable, technical, or quasi-solutions that AI developers can use.…”

AI and Auditing: Enhancing Audit Efficiency and Effectiveness with Artificial Intelligence

“…AI audits, both internal and external, are crucial for assessing design logics, building ethical systems, and avoiding potential negative societal impacts from AI systems (Ugwudike, 2021;Solanki et al, 2022). Auditing is integral to risk assessment, ensuring that internal controls operate effectively to reduce business risks to acceptable levels (Barta & Görcsi, 2021).…”