Operationalization and Reporting Practices in Manuscripts Addressing Gender Differences in Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Bibliographical Study

Abstract

Historically, authors in the biomedical field have often conflated the terms sex and gender in their research significantly limiting the reproducibility of the reported results. In the present study, we investigated current reporting practices around gender in biomedical publications that claim the identification of “gender differences”. Our systematic research identified 1117 articles for the year 2019. After random selection of 400 publications and application of inclusion criteria, 302 articles were included for analysis. Using a systematic evaluation grid, we assessed the provided methodological detail in the operationalization of gender and the provision of gender-related information throughout the manuscript. Of the 302 articles, 69 (23%) solely addressed biological sex. The remaining articles investigated gender, yet only 15 (6.5%) offered reproducible information about the operationalization of the gender dimension studied. Followingly, these manuscripts also provided more detailed gender-specific background, analyses and discussions compared to the ones not detailing the operationalization of gender. Overall, our study demonstrated persistent inadequacies in the conceptual understanding and methodological operationalization of gender in the biomedical field. Methodological rigor correlated with more nuanced and informative reporting, highlighting the need for appropriate training to increase output quality and reproducibility in the field.

Vascular Diseases in Women: Do Women Suffer from Them Differently?

“…Sex and gender are two separate terms that both impact on health; however, they tend to be conflated in medicine. A 2022 study of biomedical publications found that the term 'gender differences' only analyzed and reported biological occurrences, demonstrating how such terminology is still used interchangeably and incorrectly in medical research [56]. Sex refers to characteristics that are biological and physiological that define men and women, whereas gender describes socially constructed characteristics, norms, and behaviors that supposedly characterize women and men [57].…”

Gender scores in epidemiological research: methods, advantages and implications

“…Recent research shows that 29% of the scientific biomedical articles claiming to assess gender differences actually focus on sex differences. 18 This blurring of the concepts mixes up the relative contribution of sex and gender to health outcomes, ultimately affecting the validity of conclusions drawn from research and thereby the efficacy of policymaking and health interventions. Although sex and gender are continuously shaping each other, the two concepts are different and we do not necessarily consider one as the direct consequence of the other.…”

Unveiling Gender-Based Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Analysis

“…Studies of the physical or physiological aspects of work may benefit from the consideration of sex (biological differences). In contrast, studies of the social, identity, or power aspects of work may benefit from consideration of gender (social roles) [17]. Because of the interconnected nature of the physical and social dimensions of exposure, it can be challenging to draw clear distinctions between sex and gender in practice [18].…”