Abstract.On several examples from interval and fuzzy computations and from related areas, we show that when the results of data processing are unusually good, their computation is unusually complex. This makes us think that there should be an analog of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle well known in quantum mechanics: when we an unusually beneficial situation in terms of results, it is not as perfect in terms of computations leading to these results. In short, nothing is perfect.
First Case Study: Interval ComputationsNeed for data processing. In science and engineering, we want to understand how the world works, we want to predict the results of the world processes, and we want to design a way to control and change these processes so that the results will be most beneficial for the humankind.For example, in meteorology, we want to know the weather now, we want to predict the future weather, and -if, e.g., floods are expected, we want to develop strategies that would help us minimize the flood damage.Usually, we know the equations that describe how these systems change in time. Based on these equations, engineers and scientists have developed algorithms that enable them to predict the values of the desired quantities -and find the best values of the control parameters. As input, these algorithms take the current and past values of the corresponding quantities.For example, if we want to predict the trajectory of the spaceship, we need to find its current location and velocity, the current position of the Earth and of the celestial bodies, then we can use Newton's equations to find the future locations of the spaceship.In many situations -e.g., in weather prediction -the corresponding computations require a large amount of input data and a large amount of computations steps. Such computations (data processing) are the main reason why computers were invented in the first place -to be able to perform these computations in reasonable time.