2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operative mortality after hepatic resection: Are literature-based rates broadly applicable?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
55
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5 The overall morbidity and mortality associated with hepatic resection however appears to be under-reported, based on large database reviews. 6 Identification of potentially modifiable factors associated with morbidity and mortality following major liver resection is therefore important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4,5 The overall morbidity and mortality associated with hepatic resection however appears to be under-reported, based on large database reviews. 6 Identification of potentially modifiable factors associated with morbidity and mortality following major liver resection is therefore important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] In cases of major hepatic resection, there is a clear association between mortality and surgical volume when arbitrary cut-offs are used to differentiate high-from a low-volume centers. 6,11,12 There is no consistency or clear reasoning for using certain cut-off thresholds with definitions ranging from 15 to 50 cases per annum used to define a high-volume center. 6,11,12 No previous population studies have examined the association of surgical volume as a continuous variable with inpatient mortality following major hepatic resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the incidence of PLF in Germany can hardly be appraised, since there is no register or special code within the disease classification or the reimbursement system. Moreover, negative study results often remain unreported and the available data in literature may underestimate the incidence of PLF [17]. If an overall incidence of 5% is suggested, approximately 750 patients would suffer from PLF in Germany every year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis of van den Broek et al estimated the risk of PLF between 0.7% and 9.1% [14]. However, Asiyanbola et al suggested that actual mortality rates might be even higher due to underreporting of unfavorable study results [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%