2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operative pancreatic debridement: Contemporary outcomes in changing times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another retrospective study showed that patients who undergo a minimally invasive procedure before surgical debridement are more acutely ill, and when they are "stepped-up" to open pancreatic debridement they experience significantly greater post-operative morbidity. [7] Taken together, these findings suggest that there can be negative consequences to a one-size-fits-all approach to the management of severe AP, with or without necrotizing and/or infected components. Thus, the real-world clinical scenario may be that surgery may be performed late.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another retrospective study showed that patients who undergo a minimally invasive procedure before surgical debridement are more acutely ill, and when they are "stepped-up" to open pancreatic debridement they experience significantly greater post-operative morbidity. [7] Taken together, these findings suggest that there can be negative consequences to a one-size-fits-all approach to the management of severe AP, with or without necrotizing and/or infected components. Thus, the real-world clinical scenario may be that surgery may be performed late.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In this study, patients with NP and a high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Enquiry II score might have benefitted from surgical intervention, rather than a drainage-first approach. Another retrospective study showed that patients who undergo a minimally invasive procedure before surgical debridement are more acutely ill, and when they are “stepped-up” to open pancreatic debridement they experience significantly greater post-operative morbidity [7] . Taken together, these findings suggest that there can be negative consequences to a one-size-fits-all approach to the management of severe AP, with or without necrotizing and/or infected components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, contemporary studies, incorporating such modern tenets of NP management as delaying intervention and using preoperative drainage, have shown mortality rates in the range of 2% to 10%. 6,21,33 Open transperitoneal necrosectomy can be a valuable technique for multifocal necrosis that responds poorly to less invasive interventions or select cases of intestinal fistula. Transperitoneal necrosectomy can also be performed laparoscopically, although this technique has largely fallen out of favor as the less invasive techniques described above have become available.…”
Section: Transperitoneal Necrosectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21,22] Cases have been reported to emphasize the significance of dynamic surveillance during step-up strategy. [23,24] Recently, several therapeutic strategies including step-jump approach, skip-up approach and even one-step approach have been proposed. [25,26] Cao et al [26] retrospectively analyzed 94 patients (n = 45 in 1-step and n = 49 in step-up groups) and found there was no significance in terms of death (8.89 vs 8.17%; P = .949), long-term complications (18.37 vs 15.56%; P = .717), and new organ failure (14.29 vs 14.33%; P = .832) between 2 groups.…”
Section: Renovation Of Step-up Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%