2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operative resection of primary carcinoid neoplasms in patients with liver metastases yields significantly better survival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
110
2
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
110
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, in patients with unresectable liver metastases it has the palliative aim of avoiding local complications, such as obstruction and bleeding. Finally, even when curative resection of liver metastases is no longer a possibility, the resection of primary tumors (mesenteric lymph node metastases included) may still provide substantial survival benefit [4,5,[14][15][16]. However, strong evidences supporting this approach are lacking and the ENETS Consensus Guidelines suggest caution: an interdisciplinary team should evaluate patients that fit for surgery with unresectable liver metastases [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, in patients with unresectable liver metastases it has the palliative aim of avoiding local complications, such as obstruction and bleeding. Finally, even when curative resection of liver metastases is no longer a possibility, the resection of primary tumors (mesenteric lymph node metastases included) may still provide substantial survival benefit [4,5,[14][15][16]. However, strong evidences supporting this approach are lacking and the ENETS Consensus Guidelines suggest caution: an interdisciplinary team should evaluate patients that fit for surgery with unresectable liver metastases [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Resection of the primary tumor may also result in better progression-free survival and overall survival even in patients with metastatic disease. 19 Despite the availability of various imaging modalities, the primary tumor is not identified in 20-50% of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. 1 Histological evaluation of a liver biopsy containing metastatic neuroendocrine tumor provides another possible method for identification of the primary site of origin of the tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over last 30 years, the incidence of NETs were still increased and its survival rates were still unsatisfied. Some studies suggested the resection of a GI-NET primary may improve survival [29][30] , which means the identification of the primary site is significant for it may effectively help for the selection and evaluation of treatment. According to statistics mentioned before, immunohistochemical staining for NKX2.2 should be applied in clinical management to identify the different form of NETs and guide therapy.…”
Section: Nkx22mentioning
confidence: 99%