2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operative team communication during simulated emergencies: Too busy to respond?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
30
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in team leader behavior in less effective teams were only found in the behaviors Inquiry and Questioning. In addition, the less effective teams showed differences in follower behavior, namely less check back behavior, which is a crucial step in closed-loop-communication to confirm an initial message from the team leader and to avoid mistakes and misunderstandings (Davis et al, 2017;Härgestam et al, 2013;Jacobsson et al, 2012;Schmutz et al, 2015). It could thus be the case that the finding that the team leader is more dominant during stressful moments in less effective teams, is related to less check back behavior from their followers: the team leader has to repeat or rephrase often because the followers do not confirm (check back) his or her commands which leads to a relatively greater contribution of the team leader.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in team leader behavior in less effective teams were only found in the behaviors Inquiry and Questioning. In addition, the less effective teams showed differences in follower behavior, namely less check back behavior, which is a crucial step in closed-loop-communication to confirm an initial message from the team leader and to avoid mistakes and misunderstandings (Davis et al, 2017;Härgestam et al, 2013;Jacobsson et al, 2012;Schmutz et al, 2015). It could thus be the case that the finding that the team leader is more dominant during stressful moments in less effective teams, is related to less check back behavior from their followers: the team leader has to repeat or rephrase often because the followers do not confirm (check back) his or her commands which leads to a relatively greater contribution of the team leader.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During resuscitation, the use of closed-loop-communication is advocated to avoid errors (Fernandez Castelao et al, 2013). This clear, structured, and standardized form of communication (Brindley & Reynolds, 2011;Härgestam, Lindkvist, Brulin, Jacobsson, & Hultin, 2013) consists of an initial message (call-out) by the team leader, which should be confirmed or acknowledged by the receiver (check back) and confirmed once again by the team leader (closing the loop) (Davis et al, 2017;Härgestam et al, 2013;Jacobsson, Hargestam, Hultin, & Brulin, 2012;Schmutz, Hoffmann, Heimberg, & Manser, 2015). Hence, in general, various studies from different fields suggest that effective and less effective action teams differ in both the content and structure of their team interaction.…”
Section: Team Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this part of the simulation was to determine if the RNFA student would request blood from the RN circulator and provide updates on that request to the OR team. Meeting this objective would illustrate the RNFA student’s ability to recognize and execute closed-loop communication 14,15 …”
Section: Interprofessional Simulation Exercise For Rn First Assistantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 mg Adrenalin ist injiziert." Mit dieser Kommunikationsstrategie sollen Missverständnisse verhindert und Fehler frühzeitig erkannt werden [8] [9]. Hätte Person B nicht 1 mg Adrenalin verstanden, sondern 3 mg, wäre es in der Wiederholung der Nachricht aufgefallen und hätte durch den Sender korrigiert werden können.…”
Section: "Closed Loop"-kommunikationunclassified