2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operative versus non-operative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: The difference in baseline suspicion of strangulation between operative and non-operative groups is a major confounding factor in current literature. The benefit of surgical treatment should be balanced with the risks associated with surgery, patient's co-morbidities, and presence or absence of strangulation. Based on the best available evidence it could be argued that surgical intervention could be preserved for cases with high suspicion or evidence of bowel strangulation. The controversy still remains for op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[28] The mortality rate of adhesive AMBO has decreased from 5.29% to 3.77% with timely operative management, but there is still a higher mortality risk than with conservative management. [29,30] In the present study, 76.7% of adhesive AMBO cases were managed conservatively and only 23.3% underwent surgery. In all, 44.6% (n=33) of the surgical group had adhesiolysis and 15% (n=5) of the adhesiolysis procedures were performed laparoscopically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…[28] The mortality rate of adhesive AMBO has decreased from 5.29% to 3.77% with timely operative management, but there is still a higher mortality risk than with conservative management. [29,30] In the present study, 76.7% of adhesive AMBO cases were managed conservatively and only 23.3% underwent surgery. In all, 44.6% (n=33) of the surgical group had adhesiolysis and 15% (n=5) of the adhesiolysis procedures were performed laparoscopically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…However, there is still debate regarding the optimum duration of conservative management and the timing of surgery for SBO, especially when the SBO is due to seat belt injuries, because no high-quality studies have been performed to examine these issues [9,10]. To date, most data with beneficial effects are from case reports or observational studies that enrolled a limited number of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the study period, the first admission for SBO was defined as the index date. Other causes for SBO including malignancy, volvulus, postoperative ileus (within 1 month), inflammatory bowel disease, large bowel obstruction, hernia, radiation-related obstruction, and Meckel's diverticulum were excluded [ 8 11 ]. At initial admission, CT scan and blood work were performed for all patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%