2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-019-03603-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator-Algebraic Construction of Gauge Theories and Jones’ Actions of Thompson’s Groups

Abstract: Using ideas from Jones, lattice gauge theory and loop quantum gravity, we construct 1+1-dimensional gauge theories on a spacetime cylinder. Given a separable compact group G, we construct localized time-zero fields on the spatial torus as a net of C*-algebras together with an action of the gauge group that is an infinite product of G over the dyadic rationals and, using a recent machinery of Jones, an action of Thompson's group T as a replacement of the spatial diffeomorphism group. Adding a family of probabil… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural generalizations of the latter arising in the context of lattice gauge theory are [13,14,59]:…”
Section: An Operator-algebraic Renormalization Group Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Natural generalizations of the latter arising in the context of lattice gauge theory are [13,14,59]:…”
Section: An Operator-algebraic Renormalization Group Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, where the goal is to obtain an infrared scaling limit. From this we can make three basic observations, see also [13,14]:…”
Section: Proof By Construction the Inner Product On The Gns Hilbert Space H (∞)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent series of paper (Lang et al, 2018a;Lang et al, 2018b;Lang et al, 2018c;Lang et al, 2018d) we introduced a Hamiltonian formulation of the renormalization group which is rather close in methodology to density matrix renormalization (Brothier and Stottmeister, 2019;Brothier, 2019;Stottmeister et al, 2020) and projective renormalization (Okołow, 2013;Kijowski and Okołow, 2017;Lanéry and Thiemann, 2017a;Lanéry and Thiemann, 2017b;Lanéry and Thiemann, 2018;Lanéry, 2018;Lanéry, 2016;Yamasaki, 1985) which in turn are based on the seminal ideas of Wilson, Kadanov and Fisher (Fisher, 1974;Wilson, 1975;Kadanoff, 1977). The proposal is motivated by formulations of the renormalization group in the covariant setting (Fisher, 1974;Wilson, 1975;Kadanoff, 1977;Wilson and Kogut, 1974;Peter, 1998) which can be reformulated in Hamiltonian terms using Osterwalder-Schrader reconstruction and in fact gives rise to a natural flow of inductive structures and Hamiltonian quadratic forms (Lang et al, 2018a;Lang et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, this does not guarantee universality under any changes of coarse graining map-a property which cannot be true in general. However, it is possible to show that for the Hamiltonian RG formulation all coarse graining maps are unitary equivalent, albeit the initial discretisations may change under said unitary map, see(Bahr and Liegener, 2020) for all details.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences | www.frontiersin.org January 2021 | Volume 7 | Article 547550…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%