2013
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator exposure to x-ray in left and right radial access during percutaneous coronary procedures: OPERA randomised study

Abstract: The LRA was associated in the present report with a lower radiation dose absorbed by the operator during coronary angiography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in the TALENT study, LR was associated with a significantly lower amount of fluoroscopy and DAP as compared to RR in the fellow group, whereas no differences were observed in the senior operator group [14]. Nevertheless, in the OPERA randomized study no significant differences were observed in DAP, fluoroscopy time and contrast volume despite 3 out of 5 operators were not expert in trans-radial approach (less than 100 procedures performed by each operator) [17]. Catheter shapes appositely designed for trans-radial approach are commercially available and were shown to be associated with lower procedural time when used by RR as compared to LR [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Indeed, in the TALENT study, LR was associated with a significantly lower amount of fluoroscopy and DAP as compared to RR in the fellow group, whereas no differences were observed in the senior operator group [14]. Nevertheless, in the OPERA randomized study no significant differences were observed in DAP, fluoroscopy time and contrast volume despite 3 out of 5 operators were not expert in trans-radial approach (less than 100 procedures performed by each operator) [17]. Catheter shapes appositely designed for trans-radial approach are commercially available and were shown to be associated with lower procedural time when used by RR as compared to LR [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Three previous clinical and randomized studies [9,12,13] showed a lower radiation dose absorbed by operators during LRA compared to RRA for percutaneous coronary procedures. A possible explanation of these results was attributed to the lower fluoroscopy times during LRA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However the left radial access (LRA) has some important advantages in terms of reduced learning curve for fellows [9] reduced rate of vessel tortuosity [9,10], and higher catheter back up during percutaneous coronary interventions Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine xxx (2015) xxx-xxx [11] even if it is less comfortable for operators [12]. Moreover recently three different randomized studies [9,12,13] showed an unexpected possible advantage of LRA in terms of radiation dose absorbed by operators compared to RRA. A possible explanation of this advantage has been attributed to the lower (even not significant) fluoroscopy times during LRA compared to RRA but this issue is not clarified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transradial approach has been used extensively for both diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures; however, there is no universal consensus hitherto on the optimal choice of radial access from either the left or the right artery [1][3]. Currently, this choice is largely dependent on the operator’s preference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%