2017
DOI: 10.2172/1468578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operator-in-the-Loop Study for a Computerized Operator Support System (COSS) – Cross-System and System-Independent Evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They selected the leak outside containment and seal failure for use in operator tests. The description of the tests and results are given in [6].…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They selected the leak outside containment and seal failure for use in operator tests. The description of the tests and results are given in [6].…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, assessment tests could be directed at measuring the benefits to the operators of receiving an early warning of a developing fault condition from the COSS. The INL report [6] should be consulted for the results of these tests.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the TCS portion of the study is centered on addressing immediate needs of nuclear utilities as they modernize their main control rooms, the CVCS prognostic system is forward looking to future technologies not ready for immediate implementation of commercialization. For this reason, the CVCS system overview is documented in a separate report (Ulrich et al, 2017). The present report addresses only the findings from the three HSI variants of the TCS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some future functionality, namely a predictive fault detection system for TCS, was also tested in a few scenario variants. The results of those scenarios, which are not central to the plant's current TCS implementation, are presented in a separate report (Ulrich et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%