Non‐Selfadjoint Operators in Quantum Physics 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118855300.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Operators of the quantum harmonic oscillator and its relatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The example we have in mind is a symmetric operator and selfadjoint as well, in which case the domain makes the difference (cf. [15] or for much more particularities also [27]). This is invisible when the notion of a Hermitian operator is the only one in use, with a consequence of an automatic transplantation of the † operation from finite matrices together with its algebraic properties to would-be Hilbert space operators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The example we have in mind is a symmetric operator and selfadjoint as well, in which case the domain makes the difference (cf. [15] or for much more particularities also [27]). This is invisible when the notion of a Hermitian operator is the only one in use, with a consequence of an automatic transplantation of the † operation from finite matrices together with its algebraic properties to would-be Hilbert space operators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summing up, though, our main goal has been to prove rigorously the impossibility of generalizing squeezing to higher orders in a naive way; one of the benefits of our investigations is to call reader's attention to a need of being aware how important and helpful a domain is for studying properties of a specific operator; for a thorough discussion of the issue the chapter [27] is highly recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%