2024
DOI: 10.5194/ar-2-49-2024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opinion: A paradigm shift in investigating the general characteristics of atmospheric new particle formation using field observations

Markku Kulmala,
Diego Aliaga,
Santeri Tuovinen
et al.

Abstract: Abstract. Atmospheric new particle formation (NPF) and associated production of secondary particulate matter dominate aerosol particle number concentrations and submicron particle mass loadings in many environments globally. Our recent investigations show that atmospheric NPF produces a significant amount of particles on days when no clear NPF event has been observed/identified. Furthermore, it has been observed in different environments all around the world that growth rates of nucleation mode particles vary … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dal Maso et al, 2005;Kulmala et al, 2012;Dada et al, 2018), but this binary approach often misclassifies weak events and non-regional phenomena, limiting further analyses such as growth and formation rates. Kulmala et al (2024) proposed deriving a probability distribution for NPF intensity across all observed days, using nanoparticle ranking analysis (Aliaga et al, 2023) to produce a daily metric indicative of NPF intensity. This metric, which focuses on the daily maximum minus background particle concentration within the nucleation mode, correlates higher values with increased formation rates and event probabilities.…”
Section: Categorization Of Days Based On Npf Intensity Across Both Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dal Maso et al, 2005;Kulmala et al, 2012;Dada et al, 2018), but this binary approach often misclassifies weak events and non-regional phenomena, limiting further analyses such as growth and formation rates. Kulmala et al (2024) proposed deriving a probability distribution for NPF intensity across all observed days, using nanoparticle ranking analysis (Aliaga et al, 2023) to produce a daily metric indicative of NPF intensity. This metric, which focuses on the daily maximum minus background particle concentration within the nucleation mode, correlates higher values with increased formation rates and event probabilities.…”
Section: Categorization Of Days Based On Npf Intensity Across Both Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This metric, which focuses on the daily maximum minus background particle concentration within the nucleation mode, correlates higher values with increased formation rates and event probabilities. Additionally, grouping days by shared characteristics, such as chemical environment, season, or air mass origin, as demonstrated by Kulmala et al ( , 2024, helps identify emerging patterns and mitigates observational noise, leading to more accurate estimations of metrics like GR.…”
Section: Categorization Of Days Based On Npf Intensity Across Both Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation