2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51034-7_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opinion Manipulation in Social Networks

Abstract: In this work, we are interested in finding the most efficient use of a budget to promote an opinion by paying agents within a group to supplant their true opinions. We model opinions as continuous scalars ranging from 0 to 1 with 1 (0) representing extremely positive (negative) opinion. We focus on asymmetric confidence between agents. The iterative update of an agent corresponds to the best response to other agents' actions. The resulting confidence matrix can be seen as an equivalent Markov chain. We provide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 4. For the two cases of Lemma 2 and any initialization vector p i (0), the discrete-time linear system (11) converges towards the fixed-point solution (9) when t → ∞.…”
Section: Fixed-point Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Theorem 4. For the two cases of Lemma 2 and any initialization vector p i (0), the discrete-time linear system (11) converges towards the fixed-point solution (9) when t → ∞.…”
Section: Fixed-point Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another paper that is very closely related to our work is that of Silva [49], where the author studies a similar bribery model, but for cardinal preferences expressed as numbers between 0 and 1 (e.g., corresponding to the level of support for the current government). In his model, these values can be modified through bribery actions, after which a certain dynamic process (i.e., a form of diffusion) propagates them over the network.…”
Section: Diffusion In Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Variations of this model consider the inclusion of persistent agents [17]. In [18] this update mechanism is used to formulate and solve an opinion manipulation problem. To account for more realistic social behaviour, the authors in [19] consider opinion dynamics where agents interact in pairs only when their opinions are already close.…”
Section: B Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%