2023
DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1115695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opinion on ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6) Cost of ship design using a deepwater condenser is 66% of cold water pipe design [78] . 7) The annual operating cost is 5% [79] . 8) Energy subsidies for 2023 were $7 trillion USD [80] .…”
Section: Capital Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6) Cost of ship design using a deepwater condenser is 66% of cold water pipe design [78] . 7) The annual operating cost is 5% [79] . 8) Energy subsidies for 2023 were $7 trillion USD [80] .…”
Section: Capital Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operational life of an OTEC system is estimated to be 30 years [74] . And the annual operating cost is estimated to be 5% of the capital cost [79] . But a minuscule discount rate of 0.1 percent per annum might be justifiable [85] .…”
Section: Operational Cost and Useful Lifetimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this application to be viable, there must be a temperature difference of at least 20 K between the two layers of the ocean water (surface/deep layer), which is mostly limited to the tropical regions. OTEC can also be combined with ocean thermal air conditioning [35].…”
Section: Hydroelectric Renewable Energymentioning
confidence: 99%