2010
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002022.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opioid antagonists under heavy sedation or anaesthesia for opioid withdrawal

Abstract: Intervention: Antagonist-induced Comparison: conventional Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Outcomes Assumed risk Corresponding risk Relative effect (95% CI) No of Participants (studies) Quality of the evidence (GRADE) Comments conventional Antagonist-induced Medium risk population Number completing detoxification 576 per 1000 818 per 1000 (628 to 1060) RR 1.42 (1.09 to 1.84) 100 (2) ⊕⊕⊝⊝ low 1,2 Medium risk population Number commencing naltrexone maintenance treatment-Clonidine comparison 177 per 1000 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45 Rapid withdrawal and sedation assisted transition to opioid antagonist therapy has increased risk of serious adverse events when performed under heavy sedation and is too resource intensive to endorse given the limited benefit when performed under light sedation. 46,47 Longer period of detoxification (1–6 months) with methadone or buprenorphine are also ineffective in promoting abstinence beyond the initial stabilization period. 48,49 …”
Section: Medically Assisted Detoxificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 Rapid withdrawal and sedation assisted transition to opioid antagonist therapy has increased risk of serious adverse events when performed under heavy sedation and is too resource intensive to endorse given the limited benefit when performed under light sedation. 46,47 Longer period of detoxification (1–6 months) with methadone or buprenorphine are also ineffective in promoting abstinence beyond the initial stabilization period. 48,49 …”
Section: Medically Assisted Detoxificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally these approaches also employ α -2 antagonists (e.g., clonidine) and other adjunctive medications (e.g., antiemetics). While they may increase the likelihood of successful naltrexone induction compared with gradual opioid agonist or clonidine taper, there is no consistent evidence that they produce better outcomes than the more gradual approaches outlined above (33,6567). Furthermore, ultrarapid induction procedures have produced life-threatening adverse events including aspiration pneumonia, pulmonary edema, diabetic ketoacidosis, and sudden death (33).…”
Section: Detoxification With Clonidine and Other Nonopioid Medicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients may also still experience weeks of withdrawal symptoms and the acute stress response is very high, as indicated by markedly elevated plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol, and epinephrine levels (68,69). Thus, ultrarapid detoxification cannot be recommended, as it has no clear advantage over more gradual methods and may be medically dangerous (33,67,6971). …”
Section: Detoxification With Clonidine and Other Nonopioid Medicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few randomized controlled trials in this area have not shown opioid antagonist detoxifi cation under anaesthesia to be superior to other treatments (De Jong 2005;Favrat et al 2006). Taking into account the medical risks of the procedure (particularly those related to general anaesthesia in patients who may be dependent on multiple kinds of drugs) and other safety concerns (Gowing et al 2010) , this method cannot be recommended and should not be used (NICE 2007).…”
Section: Rapid Detoxifi Cation Using Naltrexone In Combination With Cmentioning
confidence: 99%