1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2396(199911)34:2<83::aid-syn1>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opioid peptide receptor studies. 12. Buprenorphine is a potent and selective ?/? antagonist in the [35S]-GTP-?-S functional binding assay

Abstract: We utilized the [(35)S]-GTP-gamma-S functional binding assay to determine the selectivity of opioid receptor agonists in guinea pig caudate membranes. The study focused on two opioid agonists used for treating opioid-dependent patients: methadone and buprenorphine. Selective antagonists were used to generate agonist-selective conditions: TIPP + nor-BNI to measure mu receptors, CTAP + nor-BNI to measure gamma receptors and TIPP + CTAP to measure kappa receptors. The assay was first validated with opioid agonist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35 S] GTP␥S binding, in vitro estimates of efficacy, has also been shown to be greater than that of morphine and methadone (Yu et al, 1997;Romero et al, 1999). The quantitative efficacy estimates for sufentanil and l-methadone were also higher than that for morphine and are in agreement with other reports indicating that in assays of antinociception, sufentanil is more resistant than morphine to irreversible antagonism, chronic opioid administration, and increases in nociceptive stimulus intensity (Mjanger and Yaksh, 1991;Dirig and Yaksh, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…35 S] GTP␥S binding, in vitro estimates of efficacy, has also been shown to be greater than that of morphine and methadone (Yu et al, 1997;Romero et al, 1999). The quantitative efficacy estimates for sufentanil and l-methadone were also higher than that for morphine and are in agreement with other reports indicating that in assays of antinociception, sufentanil is more resistant than morphine to irreversible antagonism, chronic opioid administration, and increases in nociceptive stimulus intensity (Mjanger and Yaksh, 1991;Dirig and Yaksh, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Our results are consistent with the work done by Pick et al (1997) showing buprenorphine is unable to block the antinociceptive affects of 1 -opioid agonist U50,488H or ␦-opioid agonist DPDPE. Although other groups have shown -opioid (Leander, 1988;Pick et al, 1997;Romero et al, 1999) and ␦-opioid (Neilan et al, 1999) antagonistic effects with buprenorphine, we simply conclude that buprenorphine given i.c.v. at doses 0.1 to 1 g does not show any significant -or ␦-opioid antagonistic components with the respective agonists we administered.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…35 S]GTP␥S binding assay (Romero et al, 1999). Buprenorphine also blocks the -opioid agonist U-50,488H-induced inhibition of abdominal stretching induced by intraperitoneal injection of acetic acid in mice (Leander, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike methadone, however, buprenorphine is a relatively weak partial agonist and, under some conditions, the antagonist effects of buprenorphine predominate. For example, buprenorphine antagonizes [D-Ala2, NMe-Phe4,Gly-ol5]-enkephalin-stimulated [ 35 S]-GTP␥S binding in guinea pig caudate (Romero et al, 1999) and, in vivo, buprenorphine antagonizes the antinociceptive and ventilatory effects of morphine and other -opioid agonists (Walker et al, 1995;Liguori et al, 1996). Likewise, buprenorphine dose-dependently attenuates the physiological and subjective effects of hydromorphone in human studies (Bickel et al, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%