Pavlovian fear learning depends on predictive error, so that fear learning occurs when the actual outcome of a conditioning trial exceeds the expected outcome. Previous research has shown that opioid receptors, including µ-opioid receptors in the ventrolateral quadrant of the midbrain periaqueductal gray (vlPAG), mediate such predictive fear learning. Four experiments reported here used a within-subject one-trial blocking design to study whether opioid receptors mediate a direct or indirect action of predictive error on Pavlovian association formation. In Stage I, rats were trained to fear conditioned stimulus (CS) A by pairing it with shock. In Stage II, CSA and CSB were co-presented once and co-terminated with shock. Two novel stimuli, CSC and CSD, were also co-presented once and co-terminated with shock in Stage II. The results showed one-trial blocking of fear learning (Experiment 1) as well as one-trial unblocking of fear learning when Stage II training employed a higher intensity footshock than was used in Stage I (Experiment 2). Systemic administrations of the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (Experiment 3) or intra-vlPAG administrations of the selective µ-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP (Experiment 4) prior to Stage II training prevented one-trial blocking. These results show that opioid receptors mediate the direct actions of predictive error on Pavlovian association formation.Learning about the predictive relations existing between events in the world is central to adaptive behavior. It allows us to use the past to predict the future and to adjust our behavior accordingly. Prediction has been formalized in experimental psychology through error-correcting learning rules (Dickinson 1980;Rescorla 1988). In Pavlovian conditioning these rules state that fear accrues to a conditioned stimulus (CS) which signals an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) when the actual outcome of the conditioning trial exceeds the predicted outcome, i.e., when there is a positive prediction error. Likewise, fear to a CS will typically be lost when the predicted outcome exceeds the actual outcome, i.e., when there is a negative prediction error. The paradigmatic demonstration of a role for predictive error in learning is "blocking". Kamin (1968Kamin ( , 1969) subjected rats to CSA-shock pairings. In Stage II, rats received a compound stimulus of CSA and CSB paired with shock. A control group received Stage II training but no Stage I training. The control group showed robust fear of CSB. However, for the experimental group learning to CSB failed. Conditioning failed to CSB, despite AB-shock pairings, because predictive error during Stage II was low: Subjects could predict the occurrence of shock from CSA and so learning about CSB was "blocked."The neural mechanisms for the encoding, storage, and retrieval of fear memories are remarkably well understood. Activation of NMDA receptors in the amygdala and recruitment of the signal transduction cascades subsequent to NMDA receptor activation (e.g., Ca 2+ and cyclic AMP-dependent si...