2018
DOI: 10.1177/1455072518808169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opioids, opioids, opioids

Abstract: Nearly 30% of outpatient opioid prescriptions in the United States have no documented clinical reason to justify the use of the drugs. This is shown in a recent analysis of physician visit records by researchers at Harvard Medical School and the RAND Corporation published in September 2018 (Tisamarie, Sabety, & Maestas, 2018). The results are not that surprising to anyone familiar with the ongoing American opioid crisis. This is a crisis entailing the misuse of prescription painkillers, heroin, and synthetic o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the editorial office we have, both in editorials and in commissioned material, paid special attention to circumstances of knowledge production. This refers for example to the space of action and claims of relevance by social science research in view of "a giant isomorphic wheel of public health" (Hellman, 2018a); the greater interest in funding research by commercial forces intent on skewing the science agenda (Hellman, 2018b); new approaches to explaining trends in use patterns (Hellman, 2018c;Kataja, Tigerstedt, & Hakkarainen, 2018); how we are to understand the epistemic project of the addicted brain (Hellman, 2018d); and circumstances that pressurise the qualitative research agenda by demands of availability and applicability in a narrow sense (Edman, 2017;Hellman, 2017;Järvinen-Tassopoulos, 2017), to name just a few.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the editorial office we have, both in editorials and in commissioned material, paid special attention to circumstances of knowledge production. This refers for example to the space of action and claims of relevance by social science research in view of "a giant isomorphic wheel of public health" (Hellman, 2018a); the greater interest in funding research by commercial forces intent on skewing the science agenda (Hellman, 2018b); new approaches to explaining trends in use patterns (Hellman, 2018c;Kataja, Tigerstedt, & Hakkarainen, 2018); how we are to understand the epistemic project of the addicted brain (Hellman, 2018d); and circumstances that pressurise the qualitative research agenda by demands of availability and applicability in a narrow sense (Edman, 2017;Hellman, 2017;Järvinen-Tassopoulos, 2017), to name just a few.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%