2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2007.00440.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunistic Matching in the Housing Market*

Abstract: We construct a model of the housing market in which agents differ in their flow values while searching. Agents enter the market relaxed (with high flow values) but move to a desperate state (low flow values) at a Poisson rate if they have not already transacted. We characterize the equilibrium steady‐state matching pattern and the joint distribution of price and time to sale (for sellers). The expected price conditional on time to sale falls with time spent on the market, whereas the conditional variance of pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
108
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
108
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, in terms of formalization and notation, this study borrows from the labour markets search frictions survey in Pissarides (2000). The idea that housing market search frictions are important for the evolution of house prices and transaction volume has been explored, among other contributions, in Wheaton (1990), Williams (1995), Krainer (2001), Albrecht et al (2007), Novy-Marx (2009), Piazzesi and Schneider (2009) and Ngai and Tenreyro (2009). This paper applies these insights to study the interaction between search frictions in the housing market and access to mortgage finance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, in terms of formalization and notation, this study borrows from the labour markets search frictions survey in Pissarides (2000). The idea that housing market search frictions are important for the evolution of house prices and transaction volume has been explored, among other contributions, in Wheaton (1990), Williams (1995), Krainer (2001), Albrecht et al (2007), Novy-Marx (2009), Piazzesi and Schneider (2009) and Ngai and Tenreyro (2009). This paper applies these insights to study the interaction between search frictions in the housing market and access to mortgage finance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genesove and Mayer (2001) propose that volume may dry up in times of falling house prices because households are averse to realizing losses on their housing investment. In contrast, this paper explains time-variation in housing transaction volumes based on the idea that the real estate market is characterized by search frictions (following Wheaton (1990), Williams (1995), Krainer (2001), Albrecht et al (2007), Novy-Marx (2009), Piazzesi and Schneider (2009) and Ngai and Tenreyro (2009). The aim of this study is to explore the consequences of this housing liquidity response for household access to mortgages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model, therefore, is potentially applicable in this setting as well and anecdotal evidence suggests that the main results of the paper (…re sales and predation) indeed hold true in the OTC markets. 1 This paper belongs to a literature that studies the housing market using search theory, e.g. see Yavas and Yang [21], Krainer [14], Wheaton [19] and Albrecht et al [1], among others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 This paper belongs to a literature that studies the housing market using search theory, e.g. see Yavas and Yang [21], Krainer [14], Wheaton [19] and Albrecht et al [1], among others. The paper by Albrecht et al is perhaps the closest to our model in terms of motivation and setup; however, it is based on complete information while ours is based on incomplete information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 See, e.g., Mortensen and Pissarides (1999) or Rogerson et al (2005) for labor search models, Krainer and LeRoy (2002) or Albrecht et al (2007) for housing markets, and Shi (2001) or Rocheteau and Wright (2005) This paper investigates the implications that social preferences have for the stationary strategic equilibrium of such a decentralized market. Agents are supposed to be averse to unfairly unfavorable as well as unfairly favorable deals in the spirit of Fehr and Schmidt (1999), 2 but we stay rather close to standard individualistic preferences: the negative weights on advantageous and disadvantageous deviations from what is considered as the fair benchmark are such that utility remains strictly increasing in own surplus share.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%