Opportunities and barriers in service delivery through mobile phones (mHealth) for Severe Mental Illnesses in Rajasthan, India: A multi-site study

Jain, Nikhil; Singh, Harful; Koolwal, Ghanshyam Das; Kumar, Sunil; Gupta, Aditya

doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2015.01.008

Cited by 36 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 15 different articles were eligible for inclusion, 10,24,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] reporting data from 12 unique samples of psychiatric patients (n = 3227 Across all 3227 psychiatric patients within these studies, the mean age was 43.3 years (median = 40.3, range = 25.6-51.8). The majority were male (61.1%) and psychiatric outpatients (92%).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Across 2 studies which explored barriers towards mHealth for people with psychosis, the most commonly cited issue was indeed affordability. 28,38 Indeed, the most recent data from the United States shows that only 84% of people earning under $30 000 perannum own a mobile phone, 39 vs the 81.4% observed in people with psychosis surveyed within the last 2 years.…”

Section: Mobile Device Ownership Among People With Psychosismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Time of data collection was reported in 7 studies [28][29][30]33,[36][37][38] and was retrieved from the corresponding author for 4 more. 24,31,32,35 The GLM showed that mobile phone ownership has increased over time (figure 3), as there was a statistically significant, positive relationship between mid-date of data collection and mobile phone ownership (t = 3.019, P = .0145, coefficient = .001, which is equivalent to an estimate of a 3% increase in the OR of owing a cell phone with every month).…”

Section: Mobile Phone Ownership and Usage In Psychosismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of “mHealth” Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies

Firth

Cotter

Torous

et al. 2015

SCHBUL

344

265

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is currently growing interest in using mobile phones to support the treatment of psychotic disorders, such as schizophrenia. However, the widespread implementation of these interventions will ultimately depend upon patients' access to mobile devices and their willingness to engage with mobile health ("mHealth"). Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess mobile phone ownership and interest in mHealth among patients with psychosis. An electronic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, AMED, Health Technology Assessment Database, and Health Management Information Consortium Database was conducted, using search terms synonymous with mobile phones and psychotic disorders. The initial literature search yielded 2572 results. Fifteen studies matched eligibility criteria, reporting data from 12 independent samples of psychiatric patients (n = 3227). Data pertaining to mobile phone ownership, usage, and opinions on mHealth among patients with psychotic disorders were extracted from these studies, and meta-analytic techniques were applied. The overall mobile phone ownership rate was 66.4% (95% CI = 54.1%-77.6%). However, we found strong statistical evidence that mobile phone ownership has been significantly increasing since 2007, and the rate among patients surveyed in the last 2 years was 81.4% (n = 454). Furthermore, in surveys of mHealth acceptability, the majority of patients responded in favor of using mobile phones to enhance contact with services and support self-management. Considering the increasing availability of mobile phones and the broad acceptability of mHealth among patients, there is now a need to develop and evaluate mHealth interventions to enhance healthcare services for people with psychosis.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mobile Device Ownership Among People With Psychosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mobile Phone Ownership and Usage In Psychosismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of “mHealth” Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies

Firth

Cotter

Torous

et al. 2015

SCHBUL

344

265

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research methods used in the 54 reviewed resources were: 25 qualitative papers , 9 surveys [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50], 7 mixed methods [51][52][53][54][55][56][57], 4 experimental [52,[58][59][60], 3 usability assessments [8,61,62], 2 cohort studies [63,64], and 4 cross sectional studies [65][66][67][68]. Collectively they reported the spectrum of factors that affect patient adoption.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Information and communications technology use in low-income countries is lower among females [44,78,79] and a 'gatekeeper effect' was noted in several studies with women requiring permission from their parents, husband or partner to use a cellphone [25,30,42]. This was exacerbated by being ashamed to raise issues about women's diseases with their gatekeeper [42] or fear of punishment if they accessed a phone without permission [37].…”

Section: User Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of patients perspective’s of m-health adoption factors in the developing world. Development of a framework

Addotey-Delove¹,

Scott²,

Mars³

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Patient perceptions and experiences of mobile health (m-health) systems have been recognised as an important element to consider in the adoption of m-health based technologies. Though much research supports this, published studies that identify m-health use by patients appear to highlight these issues in an indirect rather than holistic manner. Consequently, there is no encompassing framework that serves as a guide for effective implementation and maximum adoption of m-health from the perspective of patients in the developing world. This review documents patient adoption issues specifically and uses these to develop a proposed framework of patient adoption issues for m-health in the developing world. Methods: A structured literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus. For PubMed a consolidated search string combined ‘MeSH’ terms and ‘All Fields’ terms for selected keywords. For Scopus an equally consolidated search string was used. The searches were restricted to articles in English during the period January 2000 to December 2019 and relevant to the developing world. Duplicate articles were removed. Titles and abstracts were screened by all authors for inclusion, and those studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected for full-text review. Review and data abstraction was performed by two authors.Results: Fifty four (54) articles reported factors that impact patient adoption. Review and data abstraction identified specific factors, initially classified under 22 categories, that promote or impede m-health adoption in the developing world. Continued iterative review and discussion reduced these to 7 primary categories, with 21 sub-categories, which were used to design the proposed framework.Conclusions: The review showed: great inconsistency in the approach and tools used in published studies; multiple factors impact patient adoption of m-health in the developing world; the specific factors vary from setting to setting (e.g., country, rurality, mobile device type) and by recency of findings. Successful adoption of m-health by patients in the developing world critically depends on addressing the factors identified in the proposed framework and assessing them prior to implementation of m-health initiatives in any specific setting. The proposed framework will serve to increase the consistency of patient adoption studies, form the basis for informed policy decisions by stakeholders, and provide the foundation for greater success of future m-health implementations for patients in the developing world.

show abstract

Psychiatry: The State of the Art

Fountoulakis

2021

Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Opportunities and barriers in service delivery through mobile phones (mHealth) for Severe Mental Illnesses in Rajasthan, India: A multi-site study

Cited by 36 publications

References 17 publications

Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of “mHealth” Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies

Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of “mHealth” Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies

Review of patients perspective’s of m-health adoption factors in the developing world. Development of a framework

Psychiatry: The State of the Art

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Opportunities and barriers in service delivery through mobile phones (mHealth) for Severe Mental Illnesses in Rajasthan, India: A multi-site study

Cited by 36 publications

References 17 publications

Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of “mHealth” Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies

Mobile Phone Ownership and Endorsement of “mHealth” Among People With Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Cross-sectional Studies

Review of patients perspective’s of m-health adoption factors in the developing world.&nbsp;Development of a framework

Psychiatry: The State of the Art

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Review of patients perspective’s of m-health adoption factors in the developing world. Development of a framework