2017
DOI: 10.1108/rjta-08-2016-0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities and challenges for Minnesota sewn product manufacturers

Abstract: Purpose This study aims to explore domestic sewn product manufacturing in Minnesota. There is a renewed interest from consumers in products Made in America, thus some manufactures are taking advantage of the opportunities to produce locally. Design/methodology/approach Fourteen companies from across the state that ranged in size and product type were interviewed about the motivations, opportunities and challenges they experience with domestic manufacturing. A content analysis was conducted on the qualitative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Controllability of production X X X [2], [3], [17], [32], [43], [60], [70], [77] Coordination cost X X [1], [7], [8], [11], [12], [15], [17], [21], [22], [24], [32], [47], [50], [51], [56], [58], [64], [77], [92], [96] Customer proximity X X [1], [2], [3], [7], [8], [18], [25], [31], [32], [38], [39], [44], [45], [50], [51], [56], [59], [60], [62], [63], [70], [77], ...…”
Section: Decision Factor D B E Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controllability of production X X X [2], [3], [17], [32], [43], [60], [70], [77] Coordination cost X X [1], [7], [8], [11], [12], [15], [17], [21], [22], [24], [32], [47], [50], [51], [56], [58], [64], [77], [92], [96] Customer proximity X X [1], [2], [3], [7], [8], [18], [25], [31], [32], [38], [39], [44], [45], [50], [51], [56], [59], [60], [62], [63], [70], [77], ...…”
Section: Decision Factor D B E Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the four combinations, a US made apparel product with US material was considered sustainable and valued the most, but least preferred because of perceived high price. Though studies connected US apparel production to sustainable practices (Bye and Erickson, 2017; DeLong et al , 2013), little recent research has associated the value of US made clothing with SERAP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%