2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04902-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities and challenges of delivering digital clinical trials: lessons learned from a randomised controlled trial of an online behavioural intervention for children and young people

Abstract: Background Despite being the gold standard of research to determine effectiveness, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) often struggle with participant recruitment, engagement and retention. These issues may be exacerbated when recruiting vulnerable populations, such as participants with mental health issues. We aimed to update understanding of the scope of these problems in trials of health technology and identify possible solutions through reflecting on experiences from an exemplar trial (Onli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42,43 Finally, judicious use of technology for trial procedures and the use of hybrid approaches, which include in-person interaction at school, may help to conduct evaluations. 44 In conclusion, findings from this pilot trial are inconclusive about whether the key barriers to adolescent participation were a result of difficulties accessing online research procedures, intervention delivery or a combination of both, which may have been exacerbated by COVID-19 pandemic conditions. More studies with this age group and in similar settings are needed to establish the generalisability of these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42,43 Finally, judicious use of technology for trial procedures and the use of hybrid approaches, which include in-person interaction at school, may help to conduct evaluations. 44 In conclusion, findings from this pilot trial are inconclusive about whether the key barriers to adolescent participation were a result of difficulties accessing online research procedures, intervention delivery or a combination of both, which may have been exacerbated by COVID-19 pandemic conditions. More studies with this age group and in similar settings are needed to establish the generalisability of these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“… 42 , 43 Finally, judicious use of technology for trial procedures and the use of hybrid approaches, which include in-person interaction at school, may help to conduct evaluations. 44 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, higher drop-out rates and a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of digital interventions have been reported ( 42 , 51 ). Additionally, according to Hall et al ( 52 ), aspects of “poor technology skills, interfaces that are not user-friendly, concerns around data security, and a lack of support from healthcare professionals” should be considered when implementing digital interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important consideration is the disparities that exist in access to and use of digital communication technology and varying levels of digital health literacy among low-income groups, immigrants to the United States, and people with lower educational attainment (known as the "digital divide") [17,[56][57][58]. The studies in this sample generally avoided issues related to access by excluding participants without a mobile phone or, in the case of 6 studies, providing a mobile phone with a cellular or data plan to study participants.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%