2005
DOI: 10.1080/01441640500389562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities and Risks during the Introduction of Fuel Cell Cars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Industrial organisation concept Porter (1980) Porter (1985) Carle et al (2005 Analysis of the five classical industry forces (barriers to entry, threats of substitute products, bargaining power of suppliers/buyers, or rivalry among existing competitors) as suggested by Porter with additional consideration of • general market turbulences • external pressures (economic, social, public) • network requirements Day and Wensley (1988) Determination of the relevant levels of Narver and Slater (1990) • competitor orientation Kohli and Jaworski (1990) • customer orientation Jaworski and Kohli (1993) • intra-organisational implementation Narver (1994) Han, Kim, andSrivastva (1998) Focus on innovation Matsuno and Mentzer (2000) • customer orientation shows strongest impact on corporate success • correlation between classical strategy types and corporate success Atuahene-Gima and Ko (2001) (1) prospectors exhibit strongest relationship between market orientation and performance (2) a concurrent market/entrepreneurship orientation is the best strategic choice with respect to innovation activities' success Resource-based view Leidecker and Bruno (1984) Consideration and analysis of Auruskeviciene et al (2006) • environmental information (social, political, economic, and technological aspects) • competitor information (past performance, present programs, and future plans of competitors) • internal information (strategy evaluation)…”
Section: Market-based Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industrial organisation concept Porter (1980) Porter (1985) Carle et al (2005 Analysis of the five classical industry forces (barriers to entry, threats of substitute products, bargaining power of suppliers/buyers, or rivalry among existing competitors) as suggested by Porter with additional consideration of • general market turbulences • external pressures (economic, social, public) • network requirements Day and Wensley (1988) Determination of the relevant levels of Narver and Slater (1990) • competitor orientation Kohli and Jaworski (1990) • customer orientation Jaworski and Kohli (1993) • intra-organisational implementation Narver (1994) Han, Kim, andSrivastva (1998) Focus on innovation Matsuno and Mentzer (2000) • customer orientation shows strongest impact on corporate success • correlation between classical strategy types and corporate success Atuahene-Gima and Ko (2001) (1) prospectors exhibit strongest relationship between market orientation and performance (2) a concurrent market/entrepreneurship orientation is the best strategic choice with respect to innovation activities' success Resource-based view Leidecker and Bruno (1984) Consideration and analysis of Auruskeviciene et al (2006) • environmental information (social, political, economic, and technological aspects) • competitor information (past performance, present programs, and future plans of competitors) • internal information (strategy evaluation)…”
Section: Market-based Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on SPAES for use as PEMs have been motivated by the known hydrolytic and oxidative stability of the PAES backbone and its comparative ease of synthesis and functionalization 1b, 31. The SPAES systems originally studied were statistical copolymers,1b, 31 although more recently, groups have been examining block copolymer analogues (see Section 3.3) 32…”
Section: Statistical Copolymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have attracted particular interest due to their wide range of potential applications in areas such as portable and stationary power generation, personal electronic devices (e.g., mobile phones, laptop computers), and automobiles 1. As the key component in PEMFCs, the proton exchange membrane (PEM) must possess several characteristics including high proton conductivity, low electrical conductivity, low permeability to fuel and oxidant, oxidative and hydrolytic stability, balanced water transport, good mechanical properties, and the capability to be assembled into a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) at low cost 1b, 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the last few decades polymer electrolyte membranes have attracted more and more interest due to their wide range of potential applications in electrochemical devices, including batteries, chemical sensors, supercapacitors and polymer electrolyte fuel cells . Regarding polymer electrolyte fuel cells, the proton exchange membrane (PEM) plays a key role and is therefore the target of extensive investigations in order to obtain commercially attractive fuel cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%