2016
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world’s largest reforestation programme

Abstract: Reforestation is a critical means of addressing the environmental and social problems of deforestation. China's Grain-for-Green Program (GFGP) is the world's largest reforestation scheme. Here we provide the first nationwide assessment of the tree composition of GFGP forests and the first combined ecological and economic study aimed at understanding GFGP's biodiversity implications. Across China, GFGP forests are overwhelmingly monocultures or compositionally simple mixed forests. Focusing on birds and bees in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

11
236
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
11
236
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The GGP focused on the planting of non-native, fast-growing monocultures, which might render the resulting forests more vulnerable to pests 3,4 . The GGP thus used a narrow view of ecosystem services (the role of vegetation in reducing erosion and desertification rates) that had the additional (and possibly unplanned) benefit of a net carbon-storage outcome.…”
Section: Satellite Images Show China Going Greenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GGP focused on the planting of non-native, fast-growing monocultures, which might render the resulting forests more vulnerable to pests 3,4 . The GGP thus used a narrow view of ecosystem services (the role of vegetation in reducing erosion and desertification rates) that had the additional (and possibly unplanned) benefit of a net carbon-storage outcome.…”
Section: Satellite Images Show China Going Greenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restoration efforts are often restricted to small, localized scales. Large ecological-engineering projects aimed at producing regional-scale effects are few, and among these, China's megaprojects -most notably, the Grain for Green Project (GGP) 2 -stand out because of their unparalleled massive scale (27.8 million hectares of forest re-established as of 2013 across 26 Chinese provinces 3 ). Writing in Nature Sustainability, Tong et al 4 report that the positive effects of these tree-planting projects on vegetation growth can be detected using remote-sensing satellite imagery of a large region of southwestern China (the provinces of Guizhou, Guangxi and Yunnan), in an area associated with highly erodible landscapes called karst.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ecological conservation projects aim at increasing biodiversity, carbon sequestration and vegetation cover 16,17 , the success of such conservation efforts is not easily quantifiable, and the spatial footprint of projects is not always commensurable with contemporary satellite-and modelling-based monitoring methods. Adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change should be anchored in knowledge on how ecosystems respond to climatic and anthropogenic disturbances, but at present it is not known whether conservation projects impact on the ability of vegetation to alleviate the effects of climate change at large scales.China's ecological restoration projects (for example, the Natural Forest Protection Project, the Grain to Green Project, and the Karst Rocky Desertification Restoration Project) are considered 'megaengineering' activities and the most ambitious afforestation and conservation projects in human history [16][17][18][19] . The highly sensitive and vulnerable karst ecosystem in southwest China is one of the largest exposed carbonate rock areas (more than 0.54 million km 2 ) in the world.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the anthropogenic footprint is usually found to cause land degradation and deforestation 13,14 , and only a few studies find a direct positive effect of management on vegetation cover and biomass trends 2,11,15 . Although ecological conservation projects aim at increasing biodiversity, carbon sequestration and vegetation cover 16,17 , the success of such conservation efforts is not easily quantifiable, and the spatial footprint of projects is not always commensurable with contemporary satellite-and modelling-based monitoring methods. Adaptation and mitigation strategies to climate change should be anchored in knowledge on how ecosystems respond to climatic and anthropogenic disturbances, but at present it is not known whether conservation projects impact on the ability of vegetation to alleviate the effects of climate change at large scales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation