2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.03.894311
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunities for prioritizing and expanding conservation enterprise in India using carnivores as flagships

Abstract: 33Conservation interventions in developing countries are frequently thwarted by socio-economic 34 agendas, severely limiting the scope and rigor of biodiversity and habitat conservation. Very few 35 ecological assessments incorporate human interests in conservation prioritization, creating 36 asynchrony between planning and implementation. For conservation actions to be logistically 37 feasible, multiple criteria including ecological, social, economic and administrative aspects must 38 be considered. Understan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wolf population in Asia is data deficient, endangered, and evolutionarily distinct (Hamid et al 2019). Several attempts were made to assess the population and occupancy of Indian Grey Wolves (Jhala & Giles 1991;Kumar & Rahmani 1997;Singh & Kumara 2006;Karanth & Chellam 2009;Srivathsa et al 2020). Estimates of earlier wolf populations, wolf ecology, and their habitat assessment were primarily based on surveys and local-level information from pastoralists (Jhala & Giles 1991;Kumar & Rahmani 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wolf population in Asia is data deficient, endangered, and evolutionarily distinct (Hamid et al 2019). Several attempts were made to assess the population and occupancy of Indian Grey Wolves (Jhala & Giles 1991;Kumar & Rahmani 1997;Singh & Kumara 2006;Karanth & Chellam 2009;Srivathsa et al 2020). Estimates of earlier wolf populations, wolf ecology, and their habitat assessment were primarily based on surveys and local-level information from pastoralists (Jhala & Giles 1991;Kumar & Rahmani 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%