2012
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbs029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunity costs of providing crop diversity in organic and conventional farming: would targeted environmental policies make economic sense?

Abstract: Opportunity costs of providing crop diversity in organic and conventional farming: Would targeted environmental policies make economic sense? Abstract Targeted environmental policies for farmlands may improve the cost-efficiency of conservation programs if one can identify the farms that produce public goods, or environmental outputs, with the least cost. We derive shadow values of producing crop diversity on conventional and organic crop farms to examine their opportunity costs of conservation. Non-parametric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
21
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As to farm diversification, Davidova and Latruffe [68] estimated the technical efficiency of farms by DEA during a period of transition in the economy in the Czech Republic. Sipiläinen and Huhtala [69] derived shadow values of crop diversity in organic and conventional Finnish farms by DEA. Kim et al [70] investigated the productivity of specialized and diversified rice farms in Korea, but tourism activity was not included in that analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to farm diversification, Davidova and Latruffe [68] estimated the technical efficiency of farms by DEA during a period of transition in the economy in the Czech Republic. Sipiläinen and Huhtala [69] derived shadow values of crop diversity in organic and conventional Finnish farms by DEA. Kim et al [70] investigated the productivity of specialized and diversified rice farms in Korea, but tourism activity was not included in that analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The losses of revenue originating from the decreased agricultural potential in such conditions are basically expected to be compensated for by subsidisation. According to Sipiläinen and Huhtala (2013), the general public largely views agri-environmental support as subsidy programmes to compensate for the costs of conservation measures. In the present study, the success of Pillar II agricultural support in compensating farmers was evaluated through a comparative analysis observing PTE and CTE, where farm efficiency is observed in terms of farm ability to generate output/revenue, i.e.…”
Section: Methods Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of compensating for costs, Sipiläinen and Huhtala (2013) claim that it is commonly accepted that agri-environmental policies compensate farmers for the costs of conservation measures.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesse sentido, as florestas representariam um custo (de oportunidade) para os produtores. Esse custo tem sido calculado na literatura por meio de duas metodologias principais, em que: (i) utilizam indicadores de lucratividade e comparam a rentabilidade da produção agropecuária quando a propriedade conserva a reserva legal e essa não apresenta uso econômico, ou comparam propriedades que praticam o manejo sustentável com propriedades que utilizam toda a área do estabelecimento para a produção agropecuária (sem ter reserva legal) ou apresentam área de reserva legal menor do que o exigido em lei (AZZONI e ISAI, 1994;BACHA, 2005;CAMPOS e BACHA, 2013;CARNEIRO, 2005;IGARI, TAMBOSI e PIVELLO, 2009;FASIABEN et al, 2011); (ii) estimam o custo de oportunidade de ter a reserva legal por meio de uma função distância, considerando a perda da produção ocasionada pela mudança na combinação dos insumos necessária para a redução do impacto ambiental e incorporam desperdícios no uso dos insumos por parte dos produtores (COELLI, LAUWERS e HUYLENBROECK, 2007;HUHTALA e MARKLUND, 2008;SIPILÄINEN e HUHTALA, 2013;ZHOU, ANG e POH, 2006).…”
Section: Revisão De Literaturaunclassified
“…Acrescenta-se às críticas do parágrafo anterior que, devido à informação assimétrica, o regulador não necessariamente conhece o custo de conservação dos fazendeiros advindo das diversas políticas ambientais (SIPILÄINEN e HUHTALA, 2013). Assim, o padrão de regulação final é fortemente influenciado pelos limites experimentais (ZOFÍO e PRIETO, 2001).…”
Section: Revisão De Literaturaunclassified