2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x13001088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunity prioritization, biofunctional simultaneity, and psychological mutual exclusion

Abstract: We argue that prioritization, simultaneity, and mutual exclusion are mind-body integration functions that can't be addressed meaningfully at the psychological (computational) level alone. We describe the outlook for an integration between Kurzban et al.'s profound discussion of opportunity cost/benefit prioritization and decades of related development in biofunctional science.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have recently expressed a need for “A parsimonious theory [that] would posit a unitary mechanism for maintaining control over the task at hand, whether this entails overcoming neural fatigue in a chess marathon or muscle fatigue in a long distance marathon” (Holroyd, 2013, pg. 694; for similar arguments for a unified system of mental and physical fatigue, see Boksem & Tops, 2008; Iran-Nejada & Zengaro, 2013). Findings in the domain of physical fatigue suggest that self-regulatory fatigue can be understood only by considering both physiological and psychological factors, not just one or the other.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of The Psychological Mechanisms In mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several authors have recently expressed a need for “A parsimonious theory [that] would posit a unitary mechanism for maintaining control over the task at hand, whether this entails overcoming neural fatigue in a chess marathon or muscle fatigue in a long distance marathon” (Holroyd, 2013, pg. 694; for similar arguments for a unified system of mental and physical fatigue, see Boksem & Tops, 2008; Iran-Nejada & Zengaro, 2013). Findings in the domain of physical fatigue suggest that self-regulatory fatigue can be understood only by considering both physiological and psychological factors, not just one or the other.…”
Section: Strengths and Weaknesses Of The Psychological Mechanisms In mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The mutual inclusion/exclusion theory also benefits to understand these results. This theory assumes that if two types of processes need common elements, they may be not co-occur ( Diener and Iran-Nejad, 1986 ; Iran-Nejad and Zengaro, 2013 ). For example, if one type of affect is at low levels, the other type of affect can be at any level of intensity from low to high (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il conviendrait donc d'intégrer des éléments pédagogiques provenant de l'approche biofonctionnelle (Gregg & Carver Sekeres, 2008;Iran-Nejad & Zengaro, 2013) aux différentes méthodes existantes, afin de favoriser le développement de l'élève et la préservation de sa capacité créatrice. Notre conceptualisation des régulations tenant compte des sources de contrôle peut être utile dans la gestion de l'interaction, dans le coaching dans la formation professionnelle et dans une prise de conscience des effets de l'intervention de l'enseignant.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Ceci s'explique par le fait que notre capacité attentionnelle est séquentielle et réduite. En effet, notre système attentionnel central 8 nous permet de traiter un seul élément d'information à la fois et est notamment sensible au coût de l'effort de concentration (Iran-Nejad & Zengaro, 2013;Kurzban, Duckworth, Kable, & Myers, 2013). Il est toutefois capable d'alterner rapidement, ce qui nous donne l'illusion d'un traitement simultané.…”
Section: Sources De Contrôle Des Régulationsunclassified