2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11365-017-0439-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opportunity recognition in a hub-governed network – insights from garage services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study proposes that this phase deserves investigation because, regardless of the hub organization's nature, if an orchestrated innovation network exists, this phase must have occurred. This phase composes the model of Batterink et al (2010) and Lepistö et al (2017).…”
Section: Capabilities and Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study proposes that this phase deserves investigation because, regardless of the hub organization's nature, if an orchestrated innovation network exists, this phase must have occurred. This phase composes the model of Batterink et al (2010) and Lepistö et al (2017).…”
Section: Capabilities and Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new phase extends the responsibility and attributions of the hub organization because it inserts an activity related to the initiation of innovation into the model (Batterink et al, 2010). Although it is the role of the hub organization to identify opportunities, Lepistö, Mäkitalo-Keinonen, and Valjakka (2017) suggest that more studies explore the processes of recognizing opportunities in networks. The hub organization must maintain constant contact with the market and seek opportunities to create, network and implement the orchestration process.…”
Section: Orchestration Of Innovation Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third principle, known as pre-commitment, encourages relationship engagement with customers, suppliers, and even prospective competitors to form strategic alliances (Brettel et al, 2012). This principle suggests transparency among stakeholders, which is crucial for knowledge sharing between them (Lepistö, Mäkitalo-Keinonen, & Valjakka, 2019). The fourth principle is flexibility, which suggests that individuals must embrace both positive and negative events (Evald & Senderovitz, 2013).…”
Section: The Effectuation Process In Mncsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extant literature has focused on the application of effectuation in small and medium-sized enterprises and start-ups (Frederiksen & Brem, 2017;Lepistö et al, 2019). These prior studies find that effectuation suits smaller firms due to the challenges faced by their industry (Brettel et al, 2012;McKelvie et al, 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Causation means entrepreneurs plan a specific future and assemble resources to make this future happen. For instance, by using extensive market information to predict the wants and needs of the future and plan a route towards this future (Lepistö et al, 2019). In contrast, the more uncertainty that is perceived in a certain context, the harder it is to trust on verifiable evidence to predict the future (Nelson et al, 2018;Randerson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introducing the Concepts Of The Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%