2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposed-flow flame spread over carbon fiber reinforced plastic under variable flow velocity and oxygen concentration: The effect of in-plane thermal isotropy and anisotropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Di Blasi [22] discovered that increasing the thermal conductivity along the parallel direction of the flame spread had no impact on the flame spread velocity, but enhancing the thermal conductivity along the vertical flame spread direction increased the thermal penetration depth and decreased the flame spread rate. Similar conclusions were subsequently drawn by Kobayashi [23] based on flame spread tests of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers. However, these conclusions were obtained from either theoretical calculations or non-charring polymer tests, which might not be valid for charring wood.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Di Blasi [22] discovered that increasing the thermal conductivity along the parallel direction of the flame spread had no impact on the flame spread velocity, but enhancing the thermal conductivity along the vertical flame spread direction increased the thermal penetration depth and decreased the flame spread rate. Similar conclusions were subsequently drawn by Kobayashi [23] based on flame spread tests of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers. However, these conclusions were obtained from either theoretical calculations or non-charring polymer tests, which might not be valid for charring wood.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In other words, the orientation of the reinforcement did not affect the ROS (but there was influence from the orientation along and perpendicular to the fibers). In the case of CFRP [ 6 , 7 ], the behavior of ROS was significantly different—a significant influence of the direction in which the sample was burning was observed. This is due to the dependence of thermal conductivity on the fibers’ orientation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiber reinforcement was found to influence the combustion mechanism and to act as a barrier for the heat from the flame and to prevent migration of the matrix degradation products [ 5 ]. Opposed-flow and buoyant-flow flame spread over carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) under variable flow velocity and oxygen concentration was investigated [ 6 , 7 ]. It was revealed that a change in the orientation of the carbon fibers caused thermal anisotropy, resulting in the differences in the values of the oxygen concentration limit and the flame spread rate [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the type of reinforcing fiber can affect the flame propagation mechanism. In contrast to carbon fiber plastics [ 77 ], in the case of glass fiber plastics (for GFRER), the ROS does not depend on the thermal conductivity along the glass–epoxy, but rather, it depends on the thermal conductivity in the direction perpendicular to the flame propagation velocity [ 67 ] ( Figure 23 ). Thermal conduction in the normal direction to the slab has a greater effect on the rate of flame spread (ROS) than along it [ 67 ].…”
Section: Combustion Mechanisms Of Pmma Pe and Gfrer Without Flame-ret...mentioning
confidence: 99%