2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9ay00445a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposite changing dual-emission luminescence of gold nanoparticles by sulfhydryl to develop a pesticide biosensing strategy

Abstract: Opposite changing dual-emission luminescence of gold nanoparticles by sulfhydryl-containing compounds was found for the development of a pesticide biosensing strategy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous techniques, such as Fourier transform (FT) infrared [17,18], FT-Raman spectrometry [19], GC-MS [20][21][22][23], cloud point extraction (CPE) [24], fluorescence [7,10], spectrophotometry [25,26], dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined UV spectrophotometry [27], indirect atomic absorption spectrometry [28], opposite changing dual-emission luminescence of gold nanoparticles by sulfhydryl [6], carbon dots [7], and screen-printed enzyme electrodes [29], have been reported for trace determination of malathion in complex matrices. Despite the reliability of the protocols mentioned above, some complexities and drawbacks (e.g., use of toxic constituents and solvents, high cost, and expensive instrumentation linked with operational complications) have been associated with most of these techniques [17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous techniques, such as Fourier transform (FT) infrared [17,18], FT-Raman spectrometry [19], GC-MS [20][21][22][23], cloud point extraction (CPE) [24], fluorescence [7,10], spectrophotometry [25,26], dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined UV spectrophotometry [27], indirect atomic absorption spectrometry [28], opposite changing dual-emission luminescence of gold nanoparticles by sulfhydryl [6], carbon dots [7], and screen-printed enzyme electrodes [29], have been reported for trace determination of malathion in complex matrices. Despite the reliability of the protocols mentioned above, some complexities and drawbacks (e.g., use of toxic constituents and solvents, high cost, and expensive instrumentation linked with operational complications) have been associated with most of these techniques [17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%