2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00042-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Opposite effects of antimicrotubule agents on c-myc oncogene expression depending on the cell lines used

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism behind this down-regulation is currently unresolved. In contrast we did not observe any down-regulation of MYC levels by microtubule-targeting agents, and the relationship between MYC expression and the cytotoxic effect of these agents appears to be largely context dependent [23], [26][28], [46], [47].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The mechanism behind this down-regulation is currently unresolved. In contrast we did not observe any down-regulation of MYC levels by microtubule-targeting agents, and the relationship between MYC expression and the cytotoxic effect of these agents appears to be largely context dependent [23], [26][28], [46], [47].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, c-myc directly interacts with a-tubulin and microtubules [47,48]. Finally, c-myc expression is affected by drugs which alter microtubule dynamics [48,49]. We found by real-time PCR analysis that c-myc mRNA expression relative to b-actin is about twofold higher in HT29 than in AGS cells (data not shown).…”
Section: Hseg5 Expression In Ags and Ht29 Cellsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Similarly, pools of NF-B/IB␣ may be associated with actin or actinbinding proteins and following degradation of IB␣, the released RelA/p65 may interact with actin cytoskeleton for its nuclear localization. Given that various agents/drugs modulate RelA/p65 nuclear translocation depending upon the cell type (53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58), such a possibility cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%