Oppositional and conduct disorders

Scott, Stephen

doi:10.1002/9781118381953.ch65

Cited by 27 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 113 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Childhood behaviour problems (or oppositional defiant disorder), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, pervasive adolescent conduct problems, and drug misuse are of concern because they may lead to co-morbid academic, emotional and relationship problems and, in the long term, to significant adult adjustment difficulties (Crowley and Sakai, 2015;Scott, 2015;Sonuga-Barke and Taylor, 2015). They are also relatively common.…”

Section: Conduct Problemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Family therapy and systemic interventions for child‐focused problems: the current evidence base

Carr

2018

Journal of Family Therapy

208

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review updates previous similar papers published in JFT in 2000, 2009 and 2014. It presents evidence from meta‐analyses, systematic literature reviews, narrative literature reviews and controlled trials for the effectiveness of systemic interventions for families of children and adolescents with common mental health problems and other difficulties. In this context, systemic interventions include both family therapy and other family‐based approaches such as parent training, or parent implemented behavioural programmes. The evidence supports the effectiveness of systemic interventions either alone or as part of multimodal programmes for sleep, feeding and attachment problems in infancy; recovery from child abuse and neglect; conduct problems, emotional problems, eating disorders, somatic problems, and first episode psychosis.

show abstract

Section: Conduct Problemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Family therapy and systemic interventions for child‐focused problems: the current evidence base

Carr

2018

Journal of Family Therapy

208

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The increased risk of poor outcomes in adulthood is very large for children with disruptive behaviour, of the order of an 800-1000% increase on measures such as serious substance abuse, teenage pregnancy, leaving school without any qualifications, domestic violence, unemployment, criminal conviction and premature death. 195 The increased prevalence in disadvantaged groups is also striking; thus, in careful analyses of the definitive ONS surveys, the prevalence of conduct disorder (persistent serious antisocial behaviour) was 600% greater in the lowest income quintile (poorest fifth of the population) than in the highest income quintile (richest fifth of the population). 196 All of the family factors tested in this study predict worse outcomes in untreated groups, and it may have been thought that they would make it harder for such families to benefit from the intervention: with poorer living conditions it is harder to concentrate and make mental space for the parenting task; as a lone parent there are fewer hands to help; and as a teenage parent one has had less life experience and less experience of parenting.…”

Section: Public Health Policy and Service Delivery Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Could scale-up of parenting programmes improve child disruptive behaviour and reduce social inequalities? Using individual participant data meta-analysis to establish for whom programmes are effective and cost-effective

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: journals.library@nihr.ac.ukThe full PHR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/phr. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Public Health Research journalReports are published in Public Health Research (PHR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the PHR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Public Health Research are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search, appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. PHR programmeThe Public Health Research (PHR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), evaluates public health interventions, providing new knowledge on the benefits, costs, acceptability and wider impacts of non-NHS interventions intended to improve the health of the public and reduce inequalities in health. The scope of the programme is multi-disciplinary and broad, covering a range of interventions that improve public health. The Public Health Research programme also complements the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme which has a growing portfolio evaluating NHS public health interventions.For more information about the PHR programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/phr This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the PHR programme as project number 12/3070/04. The contractual start date was in November 2013. The final report began editorial review in February 2016 and was accepted for publication in September 2016. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PHR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the PHR programme or the Department of Health. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the PHR programme or the Department of Health. © Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO 2017. This work was produced by Gardner et al. under the terms of a comm...

show abstract

“…For example, a recent longitudinal study of preschool children with ADHD found increases in argumentative/defiant ODD symptoms over a three-year period [27].This coercive dynamic whereby individuals use aversive behaviors to attain access to rewarding resources and to reduce unpleasant experiences is a major etiological mechanism in the development of more severe antisocial behavior such as conduct disorder [28]. This dynamic is most likely to occur when children exhibit what has been termed the headstrong (e.g., defiant, disobedient) characteristics of ODD rather than the irritability characteristics (e.g., angry outbursts and tantrums [29,30].…”

Section: Oppositional Defiant Disordermentioning

confidence: 99%

Trait Impulsivity/Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder A Genetic Liability for Criminality

Eme¹

2016

SOJP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oppositional and conduct disorders

Cited by 27 publications

References 113 publications

Family therapy and systemic interventions for child‐focused problems: the current evidence base

Family therapy and systemic interventions for child‐focused problems: the current evidence base

Could scale-up of parenting programmes improve child disruptive behaviour and reduce social inequalities? Using individual participant data meta-analysis to establish for whom programmes are effective and cost-effective

Trait Impulsivity/Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder A Genetic Liability for Criminality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About