2013
DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2013.803955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oppositional defiance, moral reasoning and moral value evaluation as predictors of self-reported juvenile delinquency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results point out that moral judgement competence, meaning the level of moral reasoning, is not a significant predictor of delinquent behaviour in adolescence (Leenders & Brugman, 2005;Tarry & Emler, 2007). Some conclusions give limited support to the relation between a moral reasoning deficit and delinquent behaviour, when the latter is self informed (Beerthuizen, Brugman, & Basinger, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The results point out that moral judgement competence, meaning the level of moral reasoning, is not a significant predictor of delinquent behaviour in adolescence (Leenders & Brugman, 2005;Tarry & Emler, 2007). Some conclusions give limited support to the relation between a moral reasoning deficit and delinquent behaviour, when the latter is self informed (Beerthuizen, Brugman, & Basinger, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Under the social-cognitive framework, some studies compared the officially defined delinquents with the non-delinquent controls and identified a clear negative linkage between moral judgment and delinquency (See Stams et al, 2006 for a review). In contrast, the relationships between moral judgment and self-report delinquency were much weaker (e.g., Tarry and Emler, 2007 ; Beerthuizen et al, 2013 ). While the known-group comparison involving official records is more objective, it has well-documented shortcomings such as its vulnerability to social class and race biases ( Emler and Tarry, 2007 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The findings confirm early studies that students' moral reasoning were not associated with cheating behaviour (Academic Dishonesty, 2015). Rather CB at the school level is usually based on opportunistic venture and more on the adolescence chancy culture of defiance and CB allowed by school system or leadership (Beerthuizen, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%