2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optic pathway gliomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: Follow-up of 44 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not a universally consistent finding [15], posterior tumor involvement at presentation has been associated with poor visual outcomes in several studies [14,[16][17][18]. Younger age at diagnosis was identified as a risk factor by Fisher et al [16] and Thiagalingam et al [13] for NF1-associated OPGs.…”
Section: Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although not a universally consistent finding [15], posterior tumor involvement at presentation has been associated with poor visual outcomes in several studies [14,[16][17][18]. Younger age at diagnosis was identified as a risk factor by Fisher et al [16] and Thiagalingam et al [13] for NF1-associated OPGs.…”
Section: Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Balcer et al [14] looked at 43 patients with NF1-associated OPGs and reported that 23 patients (53 %) had no evidence of vision loss after a median follow-up of 3 years. Segal et al [15] reported visual acuity outcomes for 44 patients with NF1-associated OPGs and found that only four patients (9 %) had significant OPG-related vision loss after a mean follow-up of 7 years. Finally, Fisher et al found that 72 % of children with NF1-associated OPGs had stable or improved vision after treatment with chemotherapy [16].…”
Section: Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, during the first 6 years of life, the risk of developing symptomatic tumours is high, with optic pathway glioma (OPG) being the most frequent neoplasm [3,4]. The frequency of OPG in NF-1 varies from 6.6 to 20% [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Approximately 65% of these cases are detected in young children (less than 5 years of age), and one-third to one-half of these patients develop progressive disease. 4,5 OPGs show a highly variable and unpredictable growth pattern, ranging from indolent to rapidly progressive tumors, and may lead to visual loss, neurologic sequelae (hemiparesis, ataxia), hydrocephalus, macrocephaly, systemic signs (developmental delay, failure to thrive, diencephalic syndrome), and death. 1,4 Children with symptomatic OPG may have relevant ophthalmological abnormalities at the time of diagnosis (including marked visual impairment, abnormal pupillary function, optic nerve atrophy, and/or proptosis) due to early onset of the disease and related diagnostic difficulties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6 Moreover, tests that do not require patients' collaboration (e.g., pupillary reflex or optic disc evaluation [ODE]) allow only advanced cases to be theoretically detected because of the low sensitivity of the tests themselves. 1,[4][5][6] This study compared visual function assessment (VFA), ODE by indirect ophthalmoscopy, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) analysis by optical coherence tomography (OCT) as the diagnostic tools for OPG in pediatric patients (2-15 years of age) affected by NF-1. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%