1974
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-65920-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optic-Vestibular Orientation to the Vertical

Abstract: This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically those of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machine or similar means, and storage in data banks.Under § 54 of the German Copyright Law where copies are made for other than private use, a fee is payable to the publisher, the amount of the fee to be determined by agreement with the publisher, (c

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first relates to the existence of a dynamic intermediate state, where the weight attributed to each reference frame evolved during the task. Specifically, this phenomenon has been observed on the rod-and-frame effect during head tilt (DiLorenzo and Rock 1982) or whole-body tilt (Bishof 1974;Goodenough et al 1985;Zoccolotti et al 1992). For instance, it was shown that a 45°head tilt increased the influence of a 20°tilted frame upon visual vertical estimates, compared to a head upright condition (DiLorenzo and Rock 1982).…”
Section: Interpenetrability Between Reference Framesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The first relates to the existence of a dynamic intermediate state, where the weight attributed to each reference frame evolved during the task. Specifically, this phenomenon has been observed on the rod-and-frame effect during head tilt (DiLorenzo and Rock 1982) or whole-body tilt (Bishof 1974;Goodenough et al 1985;Zoccolotti et al 1992). For instance, it was shown that a 45°head tilt increased the influence of a 20°tilted frame upon visual vertical estimates, compared to a head upright condition (DiLorenzo and Rock 1982).…”
Section: Interpenetrability Between Reference Framesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As in the upright position, supine observers seem to respond as if they were objectively tilted in the opposite direction with respect to environmental axes. In upright observers, it has been suggested that these responses are mediated by visualvestibular interactions (e.g., Bischof, 1974). In this view, responses that occur when the otolith is stimulated by objective body tilts are also induced in upright observers by peripheral retinal configurations that normally occur when the body is tilted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same responses can also be produced in upright observers by a frame that is tilted CCW. The most widely studied of these responses involves vertical rod settings, often used to measure individual differences in degree of perceptual field dependence (e.g., Witkin & Asch, 1948;Witkin, Dyk, Faterson, Goodenough, & Karp, 1962/1974. When a rod is surrounded by a CCW frame, vertical settings tend to err in a CCW direction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to transform retinal signals, we need information about the alignment of the line with respect to the position of the eyes (Bischof, 1974;Bucher, 1988). Such alignment is, however, affected by the degree to which the eyes rotate, given a particular amount of body rotation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%