2023
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/acdd64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical and Infrared Counterparts of the X-Ray Sources Detected in the Chandra Cygnus OB2 Legacy Survey

M. G. Guarcello,
J. J. Drake,
N. J. Wright
et al.

Abstract: The young massive OB association Cygnus OB2, in the Cygnus X complex, is the closest (∼1400 pc) star-forming region to the Sun hosting thousands of young low-mass stars and up to 1000 OB stars, among which are some of the most massive stars known in our Galaxy. This region holds great importance for several fields of modern astrophysics, such as the study of the physical properties of massive and young low-mass stars and the feedback provided by massive stars on star and planet formation processes. Cyg OB2 ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following, we will make use of optical and IR data for our X-ray sources. The cross-identification process and the adopted optical/IR catalogs are described by Guarcello et al (2023b). When using optical/IR data, or derived quantities such as stellar masses, we will only consider the 5418 X-ray sources with a single optical/IR likely counterpart.…”
Section: Data and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the following, we will make use of optical and IR data for our X-ray sources. The cross-identification process and the adopted optical/IR catalogs are described by Guarcello et al (2023b). When using optical/IR data, or derived quantities such as stellar masses, we will only consider the 5418 X-ray sources with a single optical/IR likely counterpart.…”
Section: Data and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observations and resulting source catalog are described in Wright et al (2023a), with an analysis of the sensitivity and completeness of the observations in Wright et al (2023b). Guarcello et al (2023b) correlate the X-ray catalog with available optical and infrared (IR) photometric catalogs, together with new deep optical photometry. Kashyap et al (2023) exploit the X-ray and optical/IR information to assess the relation of the X-ray sources with the Cyg OB2 region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the sensitivity of our survey to a number of observational and stellar parameters is presented in Wright et al (2023). Optical and infrared counterparts to these sources are presented in Guarcello et al (2023), and an analysis of the likely Cyg OB2 members and contaminants is presented in Kashyap et al (2023). X-ray spectroscopy of the low- (Flaccomio et al 2023) and high-mass (Rauw et al 2015) members of the association is presented elsewhere, along with analysis and discussion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the completeness limits of the survey as a function of various observational and stellar parameters is presented in Wright et al (2023). Other papers in this series present a catalog of optical and near-IR counterparts to the X-ray catalog (Guarcello et al 2023) and an analysis of Cyg OB2 members and contaminants in the X-ray catalog (Kashyap et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Chandra Cygnus OB2 Legacy Survey (Guarcello et al 2023a;Wright et al 2023), which is devoted to uncovering the pre-main-sequence (PMS) population of Cyg OB2, the largest group of young stars within 2 kpc of the Sun (Massey & Thompson 1991;Hanson 2003), this issue is further complicated by the observational tiling strategy adopted (see Figure 1 of Wright et al 2023). Compared to other X-ray surveys, where either different pointings do not overlap considerably (e.g., Wright & Drake 2009;Guarcello et al 2012) or the pointings are coaxial but vary in roll angle (e.g., Günther et al 2012), the different observations in our survey are both heavily overlapping and not coaxial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%