2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.1949711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical and transient photoconductive properties of pentacene and functionalized pentacene thin films: Dependence on film morphology

Abstract: We present a comprehensive study of the optical and transient photoconductive properties of pentacene and functionalized pentacene thin films grown by evaporation or from solution onto a variety of substrates. The transient photoconductivity was studied over picosecond time scales using time-resolved terahertz pulse spectroscopy. The structure and morphology of the films were assessed using x-ray diffraction, atomic force microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. Regular pentacene films grown by evaporatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

15
107
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
15
107
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subpicosecond charge photogeneration has been previously observed in FPc and Pc single crystals 7,8 and thin films. 9,10 The similar trend observed in all crystals studied here ͑inset of Fig. 1͒ suggests that subpicosecond photogeneration of free carriers, [7][8][9][10]16 and not only of excitons, 3 in the absence of a static electric field is an intrinsic property of oligoacenes.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Subpicosecond charge photogeneration has been previously observed in FPc and Pc single crystals 7,8 and thin films. 9,10 The similar trend observed in all crystals studied here ͑inset of Fig. 1͒ suggests that subpicosecond photogeneration of free carriers, [7][8][9][10]16 and not only of excitons, 3 in the absence of a static electric field is an intrinsic property of oligoacenes.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…This is supported by our previous observation of the values measured in good quality FPc thin films reaching 30%-40% of those obtained in FPc single crystals, in spite of the abundance of deep traps at the grain boundaries in thin films. 10 Therefore, the differences in the trapping properties of FPc, Pc, Rub, and Tc crystals most likely account only for a factor of up to ϳ2 in the differences in values obtained in these crystals at RT, while further differences are due to factors ͑i͒ and ͑ii͒. For example, the lower transient photoconductivity observed in Rub compared to Pc single crystals at RT at 400 nm could be mostly due to the lower photogeneration efficiency ͓factor ͑ii͔͒ in Rub, in qualitative agreement with Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations