2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical and X-ray correlations during the 2015 outburst of the black hole V404 Cyg

Abstract: We present a serendipitous multiwavelength campaign of optical photometry simultaneous with Integral X-ray monitoring of the 2015 outburst of the black hole V404 Cyg. Large amplitude optical variability is generally correlated with X-rays, with lags of order a minute or less compatible with binary light travel timescales or jet ejections. Rapid optical flaring on time-scales of seconds or less is incompatible with binary lighttravel timescales and has instead been associated with synchrotron emission from a je… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…almost the exact same variations were observed ), and 3) flares during which enhanced optical and soft X-ray emissions preceded a hard X-ray flare [209]. Moreover, simultaneous NuSTAR and optical observations taken on sub-second time scales showed that the optical emission lagged the X-rays by roughly 100ms [142,186]. This lag was interpreted as the delay between fluctuations generated in the hot corona around the BH, that propagate up to the relativistic jet base about 1000 R g away, which is responsible for part of the optical emission [e.g., 266].…”
Section: Rapid Multi-wavelength Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…almost the exact same variations were observed ), and 3) flares during which enhanced optical and soft X-ray emissions preceded a hard X-ray flare [209]. Moreover, simultaneous NuSTAR and optical observations taken on sub-second time scales showed that the optical emission lagged the X-rays by roughly 100ms [142,186]. This lag was interpreted as the delay between fluctuations generated in the hot corona around the BH, that propagate up to the relativistic jet base about 1000 R g away, which is responsible for part of the optical emission [e.g., 266].…”
Section: Rapid Multi-wavelength Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The two X-ray outbursts in 1989 and 2015 were both hard-state outbursts with no excursion into a soft X-ray state, although the luminosities reached or exceeded the Eddington luminosity. During the 2015 outbursts, a plethora of X-ray spectral behavior was observed from V404 Cyg, with some applicable to absorption events with intermediate flux densities and X-ray spectra not consistent with a Comptonization model, and some to intrinsic variations with very high or low flux densities consistent with a Comptonization model (Motta et al 2017a,b;Sánchez-Fernández et al 2017;Kajava et al 2018;Walton et al 2017;Hynes et al 2019). In both cases, the X-ray spectra exhibit fast changes from one state to another in a matter of seconds to minutes (Motta et al 2017a;Kajava et al 2018;Sánchez-Fernández et al 2017;Walton et al 2017).…”
Section: V404 Cygmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For two segments the behaviour differs from these two categories: in the T0+877 ks segment the Xray and u-band count rates change independently producing vertical and horizontal lines, while in the T0+820 ks segment similar behaviour is observed, but a hysteresis-like pattern is produced. Large variations in X-ray flux, but no pronounced optical response was also reported by Hynes et al (2019).…”
Section: X-ray and U-band Count Rate Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…S.2. This horizontal behaviour could suggest that either the X-ray and optical/UV emission are produced independent or that the optical/UV emitting region is unable to respond to the increase in the X-rays (see also Hynes et al 2019). However, the optical/UV count rate versus X-ray count rate figure of the T0+877 segment also displays a vertical line, which shows the optical/UV count rate changing while the X-ray count rate remaining constant.…”
Section: X-ray and Optical Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%