2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt2111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical and X-ray properties of CAL 83 – II. An X-ray pulsation at ∼67 s★

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater challenge would be to explain the observed changes in period by ±3 s. Because of the large amount of inertia of a white dwarf, this drift cannot be the result of accretion-induced spin-up or -down. In addition, there is no relation with the orbital period of 1.0475 ± 0.00004 days (Schmidtke et al 2004;Odendaal et al 2014), which excludes Doppler shifts imposed by the orbital motion of the X-ray emitting plasma, for example. Furthermore, the possibility was discussed that the observed period is the beat between the rotation period of the white dwarf and the Keplerian period of the denser X-ray emitting plasma, but the required rotation period of the white dwarf would then have to be even shorter, with an estimated value of 4-12 s, which would set a new record, although this is still longer than the break-up period of 3.4 s. Finally, Odendaal et al (2014) argued that the X-ray emitting plasma must originate from an extended envelope, some two to three times the radius of the white dwarf, and if that envelope does not rotate synchronously, the spread in the 67 s oscillations can result.…”
Section: Rotation Period Of the White Dwarfmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The greater challenge would be to explain the observed changes in period by ±3 s. Because of the large amount of inertia of a white dwarf, this drift cannot be the result of accretion-induced spin-up or -down. In addition, there is no relation with the orbital period of 1.0475 ± 0.00004 days (Schmidtke et al 2004;Odendaal et al 2014), which excludes Doppler shifts imposed by the orbital motion of the X-ray emitting plasma, for example. Furthermore, the possibility was discussed that the observed period is the beat between the rotation period of the white dwarf and the Keplerian period of the denser X-ray emitting plasma, but the required rotation period of the white dwarf would then have to be even shorter, with an estimated value of 4-12 s, which would set a new record, although this is still longer than the break-up period of 3.4 s. Finally, Odendaal et al (2014) argued that the X-ray emitting plasma must originate from an extended envelope, some two to three times the radius of the white dwarf, and if that envelope does not rotate synchronously, the spread in the 67 s oscillations can result.…”
Section: Rotation Period Of the White Dwarfmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The long-term presence of the 67 s X-ray period in Cal 83 has led Odendaal et al (2014) to consider the possibility that the rotation period of the white dwarf is the main driver of the oscillations. While typical rotation periods of white dwarfs are much longer, the fastest rotation period in a white dwarf binary, RXJ 0648.0-4418/HD 49798, was observed to be 13.2 s (Warner et al 2003b), and a rotation period of 67 s is thus possible.…”
Section: Rotation Period Of the White Dwarfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A systematic search for short time-scale periodicities in all these observations revealed a ∼67 s X-ray periodicity (indicated by P(∼ 67 s)) in several of these lightcurves [10]. This periodicity is variable in nature: it disappears and reappears on time-scales of hours, and on similar time-scales the period typically varies with ∼3 s to either side of the median value of ∼67 s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It was thus suggested that the WD rotation may be observed through a well developed envelope, the rotation of which is not quite synchronized with that of the rapidly spinning WD, resulting in a slippage of the layers on the WD surface, and a spread in the observed periodicity [10]. However, a closer investigation into the nature of this periodicity has also shown that its characteristics are remarkably similar to those of dwarf nova oscillations (DNOs) (see also the independent remarks of [13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%