2023
DOI: 10.3847/psj/aca968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Characterization of the DART Impact Plume: Importance of Realistic Ejecta Scattering Properties

Abstract: The Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission will impact the moon Dimorphos of the (65803) Didymos binary and demonstrate the kinetic impactor technique for planetary defense. Observations from the ride-along CubeSat companion, LICIACube, of the spatial structure and temporal evolution of the resulting ejecta plume will help determine the vector momentum transfer and constrain physical properties such as strength and porosity. The optical scattering properties of the ejecta particles used in plume simul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particle's geometric albedo at zero phase angle is given by p R , and G(α) = 10 −0.4αf is the phase correction, where α is the phase angle, and f is the linear phase coefficient. Recent work by Lolachi et al (2023), however, shows the calculated geometric albedo dependence with phase angle, revealing values between 0.07 and 0.15 for p R for a range of particle sizes, compositions, and different porosities from several sources, including laboratory data by Muñoz et al (2020) and emitted particles from asteroid Bennu (Hergenrother et al 2020), for phase angles smaller than about 60°, so that we adopted p R = 0.1 and G(α) = 1. In any case, in the geometric optics approximation, which holds for the derived size distribution functions, the ejected mass is directly proportional to the geometric albedo, so that for higher albedos, the dust mass ejected will be lower accordingly.…”
Section: Simple Monte Carlo Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle's geometric albedo at zero phase angle is given by p R , and G(α) = 10 −0.4αf is the phase correction, where α is the phase angle, and f is the linear phase coefficient. Recent work by Lolachi et al (2023), however, shows the calculated geometric albedo dependence with phase angle, revealing values between 0.07 and 0.15 for p R for a range of particle sizes, compositions, and different porosities from several sources, including laboratory data by Muñoz et al (2020) and emitted particles from asteroid Bennu (Hergenrother et al 2020), for phase angles smaller than about 60°, so that we adopted p R = 0.1 and G(α) = 1. In any case, in the geometric optics approximation, which holds for the derived size distribution functions, the ejected mass is directly proportional to the geometric albedo, so that for higher albedos, the dust mass ejected will be lower accordingly.…”
Section: Simple Monte Carlo Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fading slows down, from initially being 0.115 ± 0.003 mag day −1 (in the 2″ aperture) and 0.086 ± 0.003 mag day −1 (in the 5″ aperture) over the first week to 0.057 ± 0.003 mag day −1 (2″) and 0.068 ± 0.002 mag day −1 (5″). This fading rate convolves the rate of ejecta escaping the system with solar-phase-angle effects that are different for different ejecta size regimes (Lolachi et al 2023). In the phase-angle regime covered by our observations the brightness of very fine submillimeter material should appear to increase slightly, while for larger (millimeter to centimeter) material it should drop, and drop even faster for larger boulders (meter sized) and for the asteroids themselves.…”
Section: Light-curve Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As determined by mapping >90 ∼meter-sized boulders, the distribution of the boulders that can be tracked in the LICIACube images shows clustering in an ejection direction nearly perpendicular to DARTʼs incoming trajectory, in the direction of Dimorphos' south pole, with a speed of tens of meters per second (Farnham et al 2023). Efforts to provide additional constraints on the ejecta properties from modeling LICIACube images are ongoing (Kolokolova et al 2022;Lolachi et al 2023;Ivanovski et al 2024).…”
Section: Ejecta Observations and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%