2010
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical coefficient‐based multivariate calibration on near‐infrared spectroscopy

Abstract: The time and expense of calibration development limit the feasibility of NIR spectroscopy for many industrial applications, with a major portion of the costs being related to creation of a sufficient set of calibration samples. Net analyte signal (NAS) and generalized least squares (GLS) pre-processing have been proposed in the literature as methods to simplify multivariate calibration by reducing the quantity of calibration samples by orthogonalizing or shrinking interference signals. Synthetic calibration ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shi and Anderson were the first to explore the potential applications of SRS in the pharmaceutical field. They, along with other researchers, published a series of reports that focused on SRS method development for pharmaceutical samples,5 the enhanced understanding that separated optical coefficients offer to practical uses of NIRS6, 7 and the application of optical coefficients to spectroscopic analyses under practical conditions 5, 8…”
Section: Techniques Used For Separating Absorption and Scattering In mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Shi and Anderson were the first to explore the potential applications of SRS in the pharmaceutical field. They, along with other researchers, published a series of reports that focused on SRS method development for pharmaceutical samples,5 the enhanced understanding that separated optical coefficients offer to practical uses of NIRS6, 7 and the application of optical coefficients to spectroscopic analyses under practical conditions 5, 8…”
Section: Techniques Used For Separating Absorption and Scattering In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since pure component materials are typically available in the pharmaceutical industry, both µ a and $\mu '_{\rm s} $ of a pure component raw material can be used to represent interfering signals when predicting the chemical concentrations of other components within a powder or tablet mixture. In a recent paper, µ a and $\mu '_{\rm s} $ were integrated into specific chemometric algorithms 8. For example, net analyte signal (NAS) and generalized least squares (GLS) were used to simplify a NIRS multivariate calibration model using only pure component spectra and concentration values from one formulation mixture.…”
Section: Techniques Used For Separating Absorption and Scattering In mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter could be achieved for example by empirical or synthetic calibration Table 3 Final configuration of prediction model for industrial processes; size of the used data set, pre-processing of data matrix, number of used components for regression and prediction accuracy Fig. 11 Result of calibration and validation of industrial data; circles indicate correct, crosses false predictions; in total, 20 out of 234 data points were predicted incorrect (11 out of 188 in calibration, 9 out of 46 in validation); graphical presentation of results based on STA analysis (see Shi et al [41]) as well as more intense investigations on the relation to the reference methods presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given such a need, a considerable amount of chemometric literature focused on harnessing state-of-the-art algorithms to enhance the signal of the analyte of interest from raw spectra, such as orthogonal signal correction [6,7], net analyte signal [8,9], Wiener filtering [10,11], etc. In comparison, limited efforts have been spent to characterize and optimize the effect of instrument parameters on method performance [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%