2019
DOI: 10.1109/jstqe.2018.2869643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Coherence Tomography as an Oral Cancer Screening Adjunct in a Low Resource Settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[4,14,18,20,33,34] There are unique methods of analyzing the above scattering profiles pertaining to each condition, including SD and exponential decay constant of the depth resolved intensity signals, segmentation of visible layers, and average deviation of the basement membrane. [15,20] However, these image processing techniques have been used to classify lesions using individual 2D OCT images lacking a spatial understanding of the changing tissue anatomy in 3D. [14,19,20] No automated approach has been adapted to handle the large HNSCC 3D OCT data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[4,14,18,20,33,34] There are unique methods of analyzing the above scattering profiles pertaining to each condition, including SD and exponential decay constant of the depth resolved intensity signals, segmentation of visible layers, and average deviation of the basement membrane. [15,20] However, these image processing techniques have been used to classify lesions using individual 2D OCT images lacking a spatial understanding of the changing tissue anatomy in 3D. [14,19,20] No automated approach has been adapted to handle the large HNSCC 3D OCT data sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue contrast does not: (1) depend upon biochemical absorbers such as in fluorescence imaging, (2) require the use of exogenous dyes or stains (requiring regulatory approval), and (3) does not require special modification of operating room ambient lighting such as in many fluorescent techniques. OCT has been shown to differentiate normal and abnormal oral mucosa . However, direct subjective interpretation of OCT images by human observers requires extensive training .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Optical coherence tomography White light Michelson interferometry Oral mucosa NA 90 % High-resolution images Fast acquisition time Non-invasive Easy-to-use Limited depth of penetration (1.5-2 mm) Light interference reduces sensitivity Negative influence on image quality due to hyperkeratosis. 1000-2500 [ 44 , 45 ] 24. Physical examination Systematic visual examination and palpation Oral cavity (in situ) NA NA Reduces morbidity, mortality, incidence of invasive cancers Identifies high-risk groups Low cost Detection in a late phase Requires skilled professional Chances of false positive and negative 200-500 [ 46 ] 25.…”
Section: Techniques Used For Diagnosis Of Oral Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study by Ghosh et al, Raman and FTIR data of exfoliated cells were used to distinguish the stages of oral cancer [ 107 ]. Few other spectroscopic methods used to detect the oral malignancy are elastic scattering spectroscopy [ 25 ], diffuse reflectance spectroscopy [ 22 ], and optical coherence tomography [ 44 ]. Light-based-detection systems (LBDS) have gained importance in the field of oral cancer diagnostics owing to its simplicity and ease of use.…”
Section: Techniques Used For Diagnosis Of Oral Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%